A survey on conic relaxations of optimal power flow problem

被引:66
作者
Zohrizadeh, Fariba [1 ]
Josz, Cedric [2 ]
Jin, Ming [3 ]
Madani, Ramtin [1 ]
Lavaei, Javad [3 ]
Sojoudi, Somayeh [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Optimal power flow; Semidefinite programming; Polynomial optimization; Graph theory; INTERIOR-POINT METHODS; CONVEX RELAXATION; UNIT COMMITMENT; POLYNOMIAL OPTIMIZATION; SEMIDEFINITE PROGRAMS; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; EXPLOITING SPARSITY; SDP-RELAXATIONS; MODEL RELAXATIONS; STATE ESTIMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.034
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Conic optimization has recently emerged as a powerful tool for designing tractable and guaranteed algorithms for power system operation. On the one hand, tractability is crucial due to the large size of modern electricity transmission grids. This is a result of the numerous interconnections that have been built over time. On the other hand, guarantees are needed to ensure reliability and safety for consumers at a time when power systems are growing in complexity. This is in large part due to the high penetration of renewable energy sources and the advent of electric vehicles. The aim of this paper is to review the latest literature in order to demonstrate the success of conic optimization when applied to power systems. The main focus is on how linear programming, second-order cone programming, and semidefinite programming can be used to address a central problem named the optimal power flow problem. We describe how they are used to design convex relaxations of this highly challenging non-convex optimization problem. We also show how sum-of-squares can be used to strengthen these relaxations. Finally, we present advances in first-order methods, interior-point methods, and nonconvex methods for solving conic optimization. Challenges for future research are also discussed. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 409
页数:19
相关论文
共 228 条
[1]   DSOS and SDSOS Optimization: More Tractable Alternatives to Sum of Squares and Semidefinite Optimization [J].
Ahmadi, Amir Ali ;
Majumdar, Anirudha .
SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED ALGEBRA AND GEOMETRY, 2019, 3 (02) :193-230
[2]   INTERIOR-POINT METHODS IN SEMIDEFINITE PROGRAMMING WITH APPLICATIONS TO COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION [J].
ALIZADEH, F .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1995, 5 (01) :13-51
[3]   Complementarity and nondegeneracy in semidefinite programming [J].
Alizadeh, F ;
Haeberly, JPA ;
Overton, ML .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1997, 77 (02) :111-128
[4]   FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS IN LP-BASED OPTIMAL POWER FLOW [J].
ALSAC, O ;
BRIGHT, J ;
PRAIS, M ;
STOTT, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1990, 5 (03) :697-711
[5]  
Andersen E D., 2000, High Performance Optimization, P197, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-3216-0_8, 10.1007/978-1-4757-3216-0, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-3216-0]
[6]   Reduced-Complexity Semidefinite Relaxations of Optimal Power Flow Problems [J].
Andersen, Martin S. ;
Hansson, Anders ;
Vandenberghe, Lieven .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (04) :1855-1863
[7]   Chance-Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow for Distribution Systems With Renewables [J].
Anese, Emiliano Dall' ;
Baker, Kyri ;
Summers, Tyler .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (05) :3427-3438
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ARXIV150604773
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ARXIV180300186
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ARXIV171003475