Uncertainty Quantification in Vehicle Content Optimization for General Motors

被引:3
作者
Song, Eunhye [1 ]
Wu-Smith, Peiling [2 ]
Nelson, Barry L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, University Pk, PA 16801 USA
[2] Gen Motors, Warren, MI 48092 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management Sci, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
来源
INFORMS JOURNAL ON APPLIED ANALYTICS | 2020年 / 50卷 / 04期
关键词
vehicle market simulation; design of experiments; discrete choice model; uncertainty quantification; sensitivity analysis; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1287/inte.2020.1041
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A vehicle content portfolio refers to a complete set of combinations of vehicle features offered while satisfying certain restrictions for the vehicle model. Vehicle Content Optimization (VCO) is a simulation-based decision support system at General Motors (GM) that helps to optimize a vehicle content portfolio to improve GM's business performance and customers' satisfaction. VCO has been applied to most major vehicle models at GM. VCO consists of several steps that demand intensive computing power, thus requiring trade-offs between the estimation error of the simulated performance measures and the computation time. Given VCO's substantial influence on GM's content decisions, questions were raised regarding the business risk caused by uncertainty in the simulation results. This paper shows how we successfully established an uncertainty quantification procedure for VCO that can be applied to any vehicle model at GM. With this capability, GM can not only quantify the overall uncertainty in its performance measure estimates but also identify the largest source of uncertainty and reduce it by allocating more targeted simulation effort. Moreover, we identified several opportunities to improve the efficiency of VCO by reducing its computational overhead, some of which were adopted in the development of the next generation of VCO.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 238
页数:14
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Andradóttir S, 2015, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V216, P277, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1384-8_10
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Discrete choice methods with simulation, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511753930, 10.1017/CBO9780511753930]
[3]   Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models [J].
Homma, T ;
Saltelli, A .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1996, 52 (01) :1-17
[4]  
Iooss Bertrand, 2015, Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems: Algorithms and Applications, P101, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-8_5, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-8_5]
[5]   Using Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses in Socioecological Agent-Based Models to Improve Their Analytical Performance and Policy Relevance [J].
Ligmann-Zielinska, Arika ;
Kramer, Daniel B. ;
Cheruvelil, Kendra Spence ;
Soranno, Patricia A. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10)
[6]  
Louviere J.J., 2000, Stated Choice Models, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511753831.005
[7]  
Orme BryanK., 2006, GETTING STARTED CONJ
[8]   Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: A systematic review with practical workflow [J].
Pianosi, Francesca ;
Beven, Keith ;
Freer, Jim ;
Hall, Jim W. ;
Rougier, Jonathan ;
Stephenson, David B. ;
Wagener, Thorsten .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 79 :214-232
[9]   Sensitivity analysis for chemical models [J].
Saltelli, A ;
Ratto, M ;
Tarantola, S ;
Campolongo, F .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2005, 105 (07) :2811-2827
[10]   On the relative importance of input factors in mathematical models: Safety assessment for nuclear waste disposal [J].
Saltelli, A ;
Tarantola, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 97 (459) :702-709