A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers

被引:30
作者
Baltenweck, Isabelle [1 ]
Cherney, Debbie [2 ]
Duncan, Alan [1 ,3 ]
Eldermire, Erin [2 ]
Lwoga, Edda Tandi [4 ]
Labarta, Ricardo [5 ]
Rao, Elizaphan James Oburu [1 ]
Staal, Steven [1 ]
Teufel, Nils [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Livestock Res Inst, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY USA
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Coll Business Educ, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
[5] Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Cali, Colombia
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41477-020-00786-w
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Livestock support the livelihoods of a billion people in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and improved feeding could increase productivity. However, this scoping review highlights serious gaps in evidence around the adoption of new feeding practices. Livestock support the livelihoods of one billion people in Africa, Asia and Latin America, but the productivity of animals remains low, reducing the potential of the sector to support higher incomes and better nutrition. Improved livestock feeding has been identified as the most important step towards higher productivity. This scoping review assessed the evidence for the uptake of improved ruminant livestock feed options, the effect of this uptake on livestock productivity and the degree to which this improves smallholder farmer livelihoods. In total, 22,981 papers were identified, of which 73 papers were included in the final analysis after a rigorous double-blind screening review. Only papers that reported farmers' decision to use a new feed intervention were selected, thereby excluding feeding trials and participatory feed assessments. Of the 73 papers, only 6 reported combined evidence of adoption, effect on productivity and livelihood changes. A total of 58 papers looked at adoption, 19 at productivity change and 22 at livelihood change. This scoping review highlights the gap in evidence for the adoption of new livestock feeding practices and provides recommendations to support farmers' uptake of feed interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:1242 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EVALUATION CGIAR CTR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1201 ESA FAO
[3]  
Ayantunde A. A., 2014, Revue d'Elevage et de Medecine Veterinaire des Pays Tropicaux, V67, P13
[4]  
Ayantunde A.A., 2005, COPING FEED SCARCITY
[5]  
Barrett C., 2019, STATE LIT INDIVIDUAL, DOI [10.17605/osf.io/5rgb7, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/5RGB7, 10.17605/OSF.IO/5RGB7]
[6]  
Bezabih M., 2016, Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, V19, P263
[7]  
Bosma R. H., 2003, FINANCIAL SOCIAL BEN
[8]  
Devendra C., 1997, Crop residues in sustainable mixed crop/livestock farming systems., P241
[9]  
Franzel S., 2003, 131 ODI AGR RES EXT
[10]  
Franzel S., 2008, SUSTAINABLE LAND MAN, P88