The sciences of science communication

被引:254
作者
Fischhoff, Baruch [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
decision making; environment; judgment; risk; uncertainty; RISK; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; PROBABILITIES; KNOWLEDGE; MODEL; GAP;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1213273110
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The May 2012 Sackler Colloquium on "The Science of Science Communication" brought together scientists with research to communicate and scientists whose research could facilitate that communication. The latter include decision scientists who can identify the scientific results that an audience needs to know, from among all of the scientific results that it would be nice to know; behavioral scientists who can design ways to convey those results and then evaluate the success of those attempts; and social scientists who can create the channels needed for trustworthy communications. This overview offers an introduction to these communication sciences and their roles in science-based communication programs.
引用
收藏
页码:14033 / 14039
页数:7
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], J PRODUCTS TOXICS LI
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, Thinking, fast and slow
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, RISK COMMUNICATION M
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1983, MENTAL MODELS
  • [5] [Anonymous], RISK
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, Journal of Mental Health, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09638230500048099, 10.1080/09638230500048099]
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2012, RIGHTEOUS MIND
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2000, CHOICE VALUES FRAMES
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2012, REP SECR EN
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2011, Communicating Risks and Benefits