The influence of smoking on bacterial resistance after vaccine or antibiotic prophylaxis against recurrent urinary tract infections

被引:1
|
作者
Lorenzo-Gomez, M. F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Santos-Antunes, M. T. [1 ]
Nieto-Huertos, A. [1 ,4 ]
Lorenzo-Gomez, A. [5 ]
Marquez-Sanchez, M. T. [3 ]
Flores-Fraile, M. C. [1 ]
Valverde-Martinez, L. S. [3 ,6 ]
Gonzalez-Casado, I [3 ]
Garcia-Cenador, M. B. [1 ]
Miron-Canelo, J. A. [3 ,7 ]
Padilla-Fernandez, B. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, Dept Cirugia, Salamanca, Spain
[2] Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Serv Urol, Salamanca, Spain
[3] Inst Invest Biomed Salamanca IBSAL, Grp Invest Multidisciplinar Urol Renal GRUMUR, Salamanca, Spain
[4] Complejo Asistencial Univ Zamora, Serv Urgencias, Zamora, Spain
[5] Complejo Asistencial Univ Zamora, Enfermeria, Zamora, Spain
[6] Complejo Asistencial Univ Avila, Serv Urol, Avila, Spain
[7] Univ Salamanca, Dept Med Prevent & Salud Publ, Salamanca, Spain
[8] Hosp Univ Canarias, Serv Urol, Tenerife, Spain
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2020年 / 44卷 / 07期
关键词
Smoking; Antibiotic; Vaccine; Bacterial resistance; Recurrent urinary tract infections; CIGARETTE-SMOKE; TOBACCO-SMOKE; CELLS; RACE; PERIODONTITIS; MACROPHAGES; INHIBITION; EXPRESSION; VAGINOSIS; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.acuro.2020.04.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The influence of tobacco on the microbiological spectrum, resistance-sensitivity pattern and evolution in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTI) is analyzed. Evaluation of the effect of polyvalent bacterial vaccine on the prevention of RUTI and smoking status. Material and methods: Retrospective multicenter study of 855 women with RUTI receiving suppressive antibiotic treatment or bacterial vaccine between 2009 and 2013. Group A (GA): Antibiotic (n=495); Subgroups: GA1 non-smoker (n=417), GA2 smoker (n=78). Group B (GB): Vaccine (n=360); Subgroups: GB1 non-smoker (n=263), GB2 smoker (n=97). Variables: Age, pretreatment UTI, disease-free time (DFT), microbial species, sensitivity and resistance. Follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months with culture and SF-36 questionnaire. Results: Mean age 56.51 years (18-75), similar between groups (P=.2257). No difference in the number of pretreatment UTIs (P=.1329) or in the distribution of the bacterial spectrum (P=.7471). DFT was higher in subgroups B compared with A. Urine cultures in GAl: E. coil 62.71% with 8.10% resistance (33% quinolones; 33% cotrimoxazote; 33% quinolones + cotrimoxazote); in GA2 E. coli 61.53% with 75% resistance (16.66% quinolones; 33.33% quinolones + cotrimoxazole; 16.66% amoxicillin-ctavulanate; 16.66% erythromycin + phosphomycin + ctindamycin) (P=.0133). There were no differences between patients of GA treated with cotrimoxazole and nitrofurantoin (P=.8724). Urine cultures in GB1: E. coli 47.36% with 22.22% resistance (5.55% ciprofloxacin; 5.55% cotrimoxazote; 5.55% ciprofloxacin + cotrimoxazole; 5.55% amoxicillin/clavulanic acid). In GB2 E. coli 70.02% with 61.90% resistances (30.76% quinolones; 30.76% cotrimoxazole; 30.76% quinolones + cotrimoxazole; 17.69% amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) (P=.0144). Conclusions: The development of bacterial resistance is more frequent among women with smoking habits and recurrent urinary infections. This could influence a worse response to preventive treatments, either with antibiotics or vaccines. (C) 2020 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 504
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The influence of antibiotic prophylaxis on bacterial resistance in urinary tract infections in children with spina bifida
    Sebastiaan Hermanus Johannes Zegers
    Jeanne Dieleman
    Tjomme van der Bruggen
    Jan Kimpen
    Catharine de Jong-de Vos van Steenwijk
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 17
  • [2] The influence of antibiotic prophylaxis on bacterial resistance in urinary tract infections in children with spina bifida
    Zegers, Sebastiaan Hermanus Johannes
    Dieleman, Jeanne
    van der Bruggen, Tjomme
    Kimpen, Jan
    van Steenwijk, Catharine de Jong-de Vos
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 17
  • [3] Erratum to: The influence of antibiotic prophylaxis on bacterial resistance in urinary tract infections in children with spina bifida
    Sebastiaan Hermanus Johannes Zegers
    Jeanne Dieleman
    Tjomme van der Bruggen
    Jan Kimpen
    Catharine de Jong-de Vos van Steenwijk
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 17
  • [4] Recurrent urinary tract infections. Antibiotic resistance and non-antibiotic prophylaxis
    Beerepoot, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2013, 42 : S38 - S38
  • [5] Antibiotic Prophylaxis Against Urinary Tract Infections After Renal Transplant
    Klem, P.
    Gralla, J.
    Chang, D.
    Wiseman, A.
    Davis, S.
    Cooper, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 : 472 - 472
  • [6] Cost-Effectiveness of a Sublingual Bacterial Vaccine for the Prophylaxis of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
    Carrion-Lopez, Pedro
    Martinez-Ruiz, Jesus
    Gimenez-Bachs, Jose Miguel
    Fernandez-Anguita, Pedro Jesus
    Diaz de Mera-Sanchez Migallon, Inmaculada
    Legido-Gomez, Oscar
    Rico-Marco, Saul
    Lorenzo-Sanchez, Marta Victoria
    Salinas-Sanchez, Antonio Santiago
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2022, : 730 - 736
  • [7] Uropathogen Resistance to Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Urinary Tract Infections
    Narchi, Hassib
    Al-Hamdani, Muhaned
    MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE, 2010, 16 (02) : 151 - 154
  • [8] Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections in children
    Long, Elliot
    Colquhoun, Samantha
    Carapetis, Jonathan R.
    HOT TOPICS IN INFECTION AND IMMUNITY IN CHILDREN III, 2006, 582 : 243 - 249
  • [9] Recurrent urinary tract infections: Predisposing factors and antibiotic prophylaxis
    Liern, Miguel
    Maldonado, Laura
    Jordan, Pablo
    Vallejo, Graciela
    REVISTA DE NEFROLOGIA DIALISIS Y TRASPLANTE, 2011, 31 (01): : 22 - 29
  • [10] Does antimicrobial prophylaxis affect recurrent urinary tract infections and bacterial resistance in children?
    Waller, Simon
    Beattie, T. Jim
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2008, 5 (04): : 186 - 187