Impact of biofilm production byCandidaspecies and antifungal therapy on mortality of patients with candidemia

Background and Objectives Few studies have investigated the clinical outcomes of patients with candidemia caused byCandidaspecies with different levels of biofilm formation. We aimed to investigate the impact of antifungal therapy on the outcome of candidemia caused byCandidaspecies that were categorised as low biofilm formers (LBFs), moderate biofilm formers (MBFs), and high biofilm formers (HBFs). Methods Adults with candidemia caused by LBF and HBF/MBFCandidaspecies that were susceptible to fluconazole and caspofungin were included to investigate the impact of treatment with fluconazole vs an echinocandin on 30-day crude mortality. Results In total, 215 patients with candidemia received fluconazole and 116 patients received an echinocandin. In multivariate analysis, Pittsburgh bacteremia score >= 4 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] =2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-4.41), malignancy (AOR = 3.45; 95% CI, 1.83-6.51), not removing the central venous catheter within 48 hours of a positive blood culture (AOR = 4.69; 95% CI, 2.61-8.45), and treatment with fluconazole for candidemia due to HBF/MBFCandidaspp. (AOR = 2.23; 95% CI, 1.22-4.06) were independent factors associated with 30-day mortality. Of the 165 patients infected by HBF/MBFCandidaisolates, those who received azole therapy had a significantly higher sepsis-related mortality rate than those who received echinocandin therapy (44.9% [49/109] vs 26.8% [15/56],P = .03). Conclusions There was a trend of an independent association between fluconazole treatment and poor outcomes in the patients infected by HBF/MBFCandidastrains.