Energy performance contracting, risk factors, and policy implications: Identification and analysis of risks based on the best-worst network method

被引:48
|
作者
Wang, Zhenfeng [1 ]
Xu, Guangyin [1 ]
Lin, Ruojue [2 ]
Wang, Heng [1 ]
Ren, Jingzheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy performance contracting; Analytic network process; Best-worst method; Risk factors; GREEN-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES; THERMOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CHINA; EFFICIENCY; EPC; MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS; CONSUMPTION; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.140
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) industry in China faces many severe risks that hinder its development. This study aims at identifying the risk factors in China's EPC industry, developing a generic method for prioritizing these factors and identifying the key risk factors, and proposing some policy implications for China's decision-makers to draft effective measures and policies to promote the harmonious development of EPC industry in China. A total of 21 risk factors in five categories including external environmental risks, managerial and operational risks, financial and market risks, technical risks, and client risks are identified. A best-worst network (BWN) method was developed for ranking these risk factors based on the traditional Analytic Network Process (ANP) and the BW method. The results determined the BWN method were validated by ANP method, and the results determined by the BWN method were also compared with that determined by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. According to the results, some policy implications have also been proposed for China's decision-makers. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Risk assessment of energy performance contracting in Türkiye utilizing best-worst method
    Oncu, Ecem
    Onaygil, Sermin
    Cin, Rabia
    ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2024, 17 (07)
  • [2] Water Saving Management Contract, identification and ranking of risks based on life cycle and best-worst method
    Ma, Weimin
    Li, Xiaona
    Wang, Xiaosheng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 306
  • [3] Prioritization of lower back pain risk factors among industrial workers using the best-worst method
    Khan, Noor Zaman
    Shihab, Suha K.
    Attri, Rajesh
    Siddiquee, Arshad Noor
    Khan, Zahid A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2021, 27 (02) : 544 - 551
  • [4] A holistic FMEA approach by fuzzy-based Bayesian network and best-worst method
    Yucesan, Melih
    Gul, Muhammet
    Celik, Erkan
    COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 7 (03) : 1547 - 1564
  • [5] Risk analysis of electrical power grids in India using best-worst method and grey causal modelling
    Yash, Dhobale
    Rajesh, R.
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2025, 32 (03) : 838 - 861
  • [6] A weighting model based on best-worst method and its application for environmental performance evaluation
    Liu, Peide
    Zhu, Baoying
    Wang, Peng
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 103
  • [7] Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on cloud model and best-worst method
    Ji, Changcheng
    Gao, Fei
    Liu, Wenjiang
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 242
  • [8] A two-stage group stochastic preference analysis based on best-worst method
    Dai, Ning
    Zhou, Ligang
    Wu, Qun
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 54 (22) : 11233 - 11247
  • [9] The Critical Risk Factors that Influence Production-oriented Projects in the United Arab Emirates: A 'Best-worst Method' (BWM) Analysis
    Khan, Sharfuddin Ahmed
    Ojiako, Udechukwu
    Marshall, Alasdair
    Dalalah, Doraid
    Ceylan, Serkan
    Shabani, Naser Nader Ali
    Al Sharqawi, Salama Imad
    ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 35 (02) : 144 - 160
  • [10] Supplier Risk Assessment Based on Best-Worst Method and K-Means Clustering: A Case Study
    Kara, Merve Er
    Firat, Seniye Umit Oktay
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (04)