Patient-specific Rehearsal Before EVAR: Influence on Technical and Nontechnical Operative Performance. A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:39
作者
Desender, Liesbeth M. [1 ]
Van Herzeele, Isabelle [1 ]
Lachat, Mario L. [2 ]
Rancic, Zoran [2 ]
Duchateau, Johan [3 ]
Rudarakanchana, Nung [4 ]
Bicknell, Colin D. [4 ]
Heyligers, Jan M. M. [5 ]
Teijink, Joep A. W. [6 ]
Vermassen, Frank E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Thorac & Vasc Surg, 2K12D,De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] St Maarten Hosp, Dept Vasc & Thorac Surg, Duffel, Belgium
[4] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
[5] St Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Tilburg, Netherlands
[6] Catharina Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
endovascular team; error; EVAR; patient safety; patient-specific simulation; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; SIMULATION; IMPLEMENTATION; OUTCOMES; ERROR;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001871
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To assess the effect of patient-specific virtual reality rehearsal (PsR) before endovascular infrarenal aneurysm repair (EVAR) on technical performance and procedural errors.Background:Endovascular procedures, including EVAR, are executed in a complex multidisciplinary environment, often treating high-risk patients. Consequently, this may lead to patient harm and procedural inefficiency. PsR enables the endovascular team to evaluate and practice the case in a virtual environment before treating the real patient.Methods:A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial recruited 100 patients with a nonruptured infrarenal aortic or iliac aneurysm between September 2012 and June 2014. Cases were randomized to preoperative PsR or standard care (no PsR). Primary outcome measures were errors during the real procedure and technical operative metrics (total endovascular and fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, number of angiograms, and radiation dose).Results:There was a 26% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9%-40%, P = 0.004) reduction in minor errors, a 76% (95% CI 30%-92%, P = 0.009) reduction in major errors, and a 27% (95% CI 8.2%-42%, P = 0.007) reduction in errors causing procedural delay in the PsR group. The number of angiograms performed to visualize proximal and distal landing zones was 23% (95% CI 8%-36%, P = 0.005) and 21% (95% CI 7%-32%, P = 0.004) lower in the PsR group.Conclusions:PsR before EVAR can be used in different hospital settings by teams with various EVAR experience. It reduces perioperative errors and the number of angiograms required to deploy the stent graft, thereby reducing delays. Ultimately, it may improve patient safety and procedural efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 709
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Anatomic severity grading score predicts technical difficulty, early outcomes, and hospital resource utilization of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Ahanchi, Sadaf S. ;
Carroll, Megan ;
Almaroof, Babatunde ;
Panneton, Jean M. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 54 (05) :1266-1272
[2]   Identification of Patient Safety Improvement Targets in Successful Vascular and Endovascular Procedures: Analysis of 251 hours of Complex Arterial Surgery [J].
Albayati, M. A. ;
Gohel, M. S. ;
Patel, S. R. ;
Riga, C. V. ;
Cheshire, N. J. W. ;
Bicknell, C. D. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (06) :795-802
[3]   Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations [J].
Catchpole, Ken R. ;
Giddings, Anthony E. B. ;
Wilkinson, Michael ;
Hirst, Guy ;
Dale, Trevor ;
de Leval, Marc R. .
SURGERY, 2007, 142 (01) :102-110
[4]   Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Chaikof, EL ;
Fillinger, MF ;
Matsumura, JS ;
Rutherford, RB ;
White, GH ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Bernhard, VM ;
Harris, PL ;
Kent, KC ;
May, J ;
Veith, FJ ;
Zarins, CK .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :1061-1066
[5]   An Approach to EVAR Simulation Using Patient Specific Modeling [J].
Davis, Gavin R. ;
Illig, Karl A. ;
Yang, George ;
Thu-Hoai Nguyen ;
Shames, Murray L. .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 28 (07) :1769-1774
[6]   Patient-specific Rehearsal Prior to EVAR: A Pilot Study [J].
Desender, L. ;
Rancic, Z. ;
Aggarwal, R. ;
Duchateau, J. ;
Glenck, M. ;
Lachat, M. ;
Vermassen, F. ;
Van Herzeele, I. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 45 (06) :639-647
[7]  
Desender LM, 2011, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V52, P17
[8]   Defining high-risk patients for endovascular aneurysm repair [J].
Egorova, Natalia ;
Giacovelli, Jeannine K. ;
Gelijns, Annetine ;
Greco, Giampaolo ;
Moskowitz, Alan ;
McKinsey, James ;
Kent, K. Craig .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (06) :1271-1279
[9]   The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992 [J].
Gawande, AA ;
Thomas, EJ ;
Zinner, MJ ;
Brennan, TA .
SURGERY, 1999, 126 (01) :66-75
[10]   Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial [J].
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Brown, LC ;
Kwong, GPS ;
Powell, JT ;
Thompson, SG .
LANCET, 2004, 364 (9437) :843-848