Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Intervention of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis in Myocardial Infarction

被引:6
作者
Darrat, Yousef Hadi [1 ]
Guirgis, Hany
El-Hamdani, Mehiar O.
Cansino, Silvestre
Gress, Todd W.
Studeny, Mark
机构
[1] Joan C Edwards Marshall Univ, Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Huntington, WV 25701 USA
关键词
angioplasty; coronary artery disease; myocardial infarction; STENT IMPLANTATION; TASK-FORCE; GUIDELINES; SOCIETY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31826f01c8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of our study was to examine the 30-day and 1-year survival rate for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main (ULM) stenosis by the presence (acute myocardial infarction [AMI] group) or absence (non-AMI group) of AMI at the time of hospital admission. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 64 patients undergoing PCI of ULM stenosis at our regional heart institute between 2000 and 2008. Patients had no history of coronary artery bypass grafting. Results: Thirty-six men and 28 women underwent PCI for ULM stenosis. Overall Kaplan-Meier survival at 30 days and 1 year was 71.5% and 57.8%, respectively. Thirty-three patients (51.6%) presented with AMI. Those with AMI had lower survival at both 30 days (59.2 vs 83.9%; P = 0.04) and 1 year (45.2 vs 70.2%; P = 0.04) compared with those without AMI. Compared with a lesion involving only the ostial/mid LM, diffuse disease (N = 11) was associated with an increased mortality at 1 year (hazard ratio 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.79). A stent size >3 mm was associated with lower mortality at 1 year (hazard ratio 0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.93). Conclusions: We found that AMI at presentation was significantly associated with higher mortality in patients undergoingULM stenting. LM lesion location and stent size were both significantly associated with mortality. ULM stenting is an option in patients who are unable to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting, but patients should understand the overall high risk of mortality, particularly if they present with AMI.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 590
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]   Randomized Trial of Stents versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [J].
Park, Seung-Jung ;
Kim, Young-Hak ;
Park, Duk-Woo ;
Yun, Sung-Cheol ;
Ahn, Jung-Min ;
Song, Hae Geun ;
Lee, Jong-Young ;
Kim, Won-Jang ;
Kang, Soo-Jin ;
Lee, Seung-Whan ;
Lee, Cheol Whan ;
Park, Seong-Wook ;
Chung, Cheol-Hyun ;
Lee, Jae-Won ;
Lim, Do-Sun ;
Rha, Seung-Woon ;
Lee, Sang-Gon ;
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol ;
Kim, Hyo-Soo ;
Chae, In-Ho ;
Jang, Yangsoo ;
Jeong, Myung-Ho ;
Tahk, Seung-Jea ;
Seung, Ki Bae .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (18) :1718-1727
[12]   Elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis - Effect of debulking before stenting and intravascular ultrasound guidance [J].
Park, SJ ;
Hong, MK ;
Lee, CW ;
Kim, JJ ;
Song, JK ;
Kang, DH ;
Park, SW ;
Mintz, GS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (04) :1054-1060
[13]   Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease [J].
Serruys, Patrick W. ;
Morice, Marie-Claude ;
Kappetein, A. Pieter ;
Colombo, Antonio ;
Holmes, David R. ;
Mack, Michael J. ;
Stahle, Elisabeth ;
Feldman, Ted E. ;
van den Brand, Marcel ;
Bass, Eric J. ;
Van Dyck, Nic ;
Leadley, Katrin ;
Dawkins, Keith D. ;
Mohr, Friedrich W. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (10) :961-972
[14]   Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease [J].
Seung, Ki Bae ;
Park, Duk-Woo ;
Kim, Young-Hak ;
Lee, Seung-Whan ;
Lee, Cheol Whan ;
Hong, Myeong-Ki ;
Park, Seong-Wook ;
Yun, Sung-Cheol ;
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol ;
Jeong, Myung-Ho ;
Jang, Yangsoo ;
Kim, Hyo-Soo ;
Kim, Pum Joon ;
Seong, In-Whan ;
Park, Hun Sik ;
Ahn, Taehoon ;
Chae, In-Ho ;
Tahk, Seung-Jea ;
Chung, Wook-Sung ;
Park, Seung-Jung .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (17) :1781-1792
[15]   Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions -: The task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the European Society of Cardiology [J].
Silber, S ;
Albertsson, P ;
Avilés, FF ;
Camici, PG ;
Colombo, A ;
Hamm, C ;
Jorgensen, E ;
Marco, J ;
Nordrehaug, JE ;
Ruzyllo, W ;
Urban, P ;
Stone, GW ;
Wijns, W .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (08) :804-847
[16]   Classification and Atherosclerosis Distribution in Patients with Left Main Coronary Disease [J].
Thompson, Craig A. ;
Sidhu, Mandeep S. ;
Brown, Jeremiah R. ;
Sabir, Sajjad A. ;
Floyd, Kevin C. ;
De Vries, James T. ;
Jayne, John E. ;
Friedman, Bruce J. ;
Hettleman, Bruce D. ;
Niles, Nathaniel W. ;
Robb, John F. .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 22 (05) :431-436
[17]   12-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF SURVIVAL IN THE RANDOMIZED EUROPEAN CORONARY SURGERY STUDY [J].
VARNAUSKAS, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 319 (06) :332-337
[18]   Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by Cardiogenic shock - Results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial [J].
White, HD ;
Assmann, SF ;
Sanborn, TA ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Webb, JG ;
Sleeper, LA ;
Wong, CK ;
Stewart, JT ;
Aylward, PEG ;
Wong, SC ;
Hochman, JS .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (13) :1992-2001