The status of the concept of reference object in measurement in the human sciences compared to the physical sciences

被引:0
作者
Wilson, M. [1 ]
Mari, L. [2 ]
Maul, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Grad Sch Educ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Cattaneo, Sch Ind Engn, Castellanza, VA, Italy
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Gevirtz Grad Sch Educ, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
来源
JOINT IMEKO TC1-TC7-TC13-TC18 SYMPOSIUM | 2019年 / 1379卷
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/1379/1/012025
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
For measurement in the human sciences, one barrier to being able to see the commonalities with measurement in the physical sciences has been the common prominence that is often given to the important place that "reference objects" are given in introductory accounts in metrology. The obvious difficulties in having such objects, say, "reference humans," makes it difficult to build connections. In this paper, we outline a way to broaden the concept of a reference object in way that addresses this issue. In this light we then discuss the recent developments in the International System of Units (SI), and comment on certain similarities.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Guidance Document JCGM 200
[2]   The Kansas silent reading tests [J].
Kelly, FJ .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1916, 7 :63-80
[3]   Beyond the representational viewpoint: a new formalization of measurement [J].
Mari, L .
MEASUREMENT, 2000, 27 (02) :71-84
[4]  
Wilson M, 2002, MEASUREMENT AND MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, P325
[5]  
Zim X-Z, 2018, NY TIMES