In-Class Versus At-Home Quizzes: Which is Better? A Flipped Learning Study in a Two-Site Synchronously Broadcast Organic Chemistry Course

被引:28
作者
Christiansen, Michael A. [1 ]
Lambert, Alyssia M. [2 ]
Nadelson, Louis S. [3 ]
Dupree, Kann M. [1 ]
Kingsford, Trish A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Uintah Basin Reg Campus,320 North Aggie Blvd, Vernal, UT 84078 USA
[2] Skagit Valley Coll, 2405 East Coll Way, Mt Vernon, WA 98273 USA
[3] Utah State Univ, Emma Eccles Jones Coll Educ Human Serv, 2805 Old Main, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
Second-Year Undergraduate; Collaborative/Cooperative Learning Computer-Based Learning; Distance Learning/Self Instruction; Internet/Web-Based Learning; Testing/Assessment; Constructivism; Student-Centered Learning; PERFORMANCE; ENGAGEMENT; INSTRUCTION; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00370
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
We recently shared our design of a two semester flipped organic chemistry course in which we gave students in-class quizzes to incentivize attendance and watching the lecture videos in advance. With a second iteration, we planned to make the video-watching experience more engaging. We accordingly hypothesized that if students completed short at-home quizzes while watching the videos, then attentiveness, engagement, and learning would increase. We tested this with a later section of the course, dividing the material into 13 units. For units 1-6, we gave in-class quizzes; for 7-13, quizzes were at home. Although units 1-6 and 7-13 covered different material, we were nonetheless surprised when students' average quiz scores decreased for the take-home quizzes because they did not have a time limit and were open book, unlike the in-class quizzes. Anonymous survey feedback showed a strong preference for quizzes in class and indications that take-home quizzes demotivated attendance and preclass watching of the videos. Thus, for analogous flipped-course designs in chemistry, we recommend an in-class quizzing strategy over take-home quizzes to positively affect engagement, learning, and attendance. Of note, this course was synchronously delivered to two groups of students at geographically distinct satellite locations.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 163
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]   Does active learning work? A review of the research [J].
Prince, M .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2004, 93 (03) :223-231
[32]  
Roehl A., 2013, Journal of family Consumer Sciences, V105, P44, DOI DOI 10.14307/JFCS105.2.12
[33]   Impact of the Flipped Classroom on Student Performance and Retention: A Parallel Controlled Study in General Chemistry [J].
Ryan, Michael D. ;
Reid, Scott A. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 93 (01) :13-23
[34]   Effects of the Flipped Classroom Model on Student Performance for Advanced Placement High School Chemistry Students [J].
Schultz, David ;
Duffield, Stacy ;
Rasmuseen, Seth C. ;
Wageman, Justin .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 91 (09) :1334-1339
[35]  
Schunk D., 1996, LEARNING THEORIES
[36]  
Simkins S., 2010, JUST IN TIME TEACHIN
[37]   Student attitudes toward flipping the general chemistry classroom [J].
Smith, J. Dominic .
CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2013, 14 (04) :607-614
[38]   Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology [J].
Tune, Johnathan D. ;
Sturek, Michael ;
Basile, David P. .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2013, 37 (04) :316-320
[39]   A Variation on the Use of Interactive Anonymous Quizzes in the Chemistry Classroom [J].
Wagner, Brian D. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 86 (11) :1300-1303
[40]   Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Flipped Format General Chemistry Course [J].
Weaver, Gabriela C. ;
Sturtevant, Hannah G. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 92 (09) :1437-1448