In-Class Versus At-Home Quizzes: Which is Better? A Flipped Learning Study in a Two-Site Synchronously Broadcast Organic Chemistry Course

被引:28
作者
Christiansen, Michael A. [1 ]
Lambert, Alyssia M. [2 ]
Nadelson, Louis S. [3 ]
Dupree, Kann M. [1 ]
Kingsford, Trish A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Uintah Basin Reg Campus,320 North Aggie Blvd, Vernal, UT 84078 USA
[2] Skagit Valley Coll, 2405 East Coll Way, Mt Vernon, WA 98273 USA
[3] Utah State Univ, Emma Eccles Jones Coll Educ Human Serv, 2805 Old Main, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
Second-Year Undergraduate; Collaborative/Cooperative Learning Computer-Based Learning; Distance Learning/Self Instruction; Internet/Web-Based Learning; Testing/Assessment; Constructivism; Student-Centered Learning; PERFORMANCE; ENGAGEMENT; INSTRUCTION; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00370
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
We recently shared our design of a two semester flipped organic chemistry course in which we gave students in-class quizzes to incentivize attendance and watching the lecture videos in advance. With a second iteration, we planned to make the video-watching experience more engaging. We accordingly hypothesized that if students completed short at-home quizzes while watching the videos, then attentiveness, engagement, and learning would increase. We tested this with a later section of the course, dividing the material into 13 units. For units 1-6, we gave in-class quizzes; for 7-13, quizzes were at home. Although units 1-6 and 7-13 covered different material, we were nonetheless surprised when students' average quiz scores decreased for the take-home quizzes because they did not have a time limit and were open book, unlike the in-class quizzes. Anonymous survey feedback showed a strong preference for quizzes in class and indications that take-home quizzes demotivated attendance and preclass watching of the videos. Thus, for analogous flipped-course designs in chemistry, we recommend an in-class quizzing strategy over take-home quizzes to positively affect engagement, learning, and attendance. Of note, this course was synchronously delivered to two groups of students at geographically distinct satellite locations.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 163
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Ally M, 2008, THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ONLINE LEARNING, 2ND EDITION, P15
[2]  
[Anonymous], SCH ENGAGEMENT
[3]  
[Anonymous], RADAR BRANCH CAMPUS
[4]  
[Anonymous], INTERDISCIPLINARY AP
[5]  
[Anonymous], P 2016 BIENN C CHEM
[6]  
[Anonymous], INTERDISCIPLINARY AP
[7]  
[Anonymous], INFORM PROCESSING MO
[8]   Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument [J].
Appleton, James J. ;
Christenson, Sandra L. ;
Kim, Dongjin ;
Reschly, Amy L. .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 44 (05) :427-445
[9]  
Bergmann J., 2012, Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day
[10]  
Brame Cynthia., JUST IN TIME TEACHIN