Piezoelectric material selection for transducers under fuzzy environment

被引:37
作者
Vats, Gaurav [1 ]
Vaish, Rahul [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Mandi, Sch Engn, Mandi 175001, Himachal Prades, India
关键词
piezoceramics; selection; MADM; fuzzy approach; transducer application; PHASE TRANSITIONAL BEHAVIOR; ELECTRICAL-PROPERTIES; VIKOR METHOD; CERAMICS; DECISION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s40145-013-0053-1
中图分类号
TQ174 [陶瓷工业]; TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Piezoelectric ceramics are extensively investigated materials for transducer application. The selection of optimal piezoelectric material for this particular application is a tedious task. It depends upon various physical properties, including piezoelectric charge coefficient (d(33)), electromechanical coupling factor (K-p), dielectric constant (epsilon(r)), and dielectric loss (tan delta). The classical multiple attribute decision making (MADM) can be used for decision making if these properties are known precisely. However, these properties cannot be expressed by exact numerical values, since they are dependent upon the microstructure and fabrication process. Fuzzy-based MADM approaches can be helpful in such cases. In this paper, we have determined the ranks and rank indices (for degree of closeness) of important piezoelectric materials using fuzzy VlseKriterijumska Optimisacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) technique. PLZT(8/65/35) ((Pb-1 La-x(x))(ZryTi1 (y))O-3) and KNN-LT-LS ((K0.44Na0.52Li0.04)-(Nb0.84Ta0.10Sb0.06)O-3) consecutively are found to be the top-rank piezoelectric ceramics. This indicates that KNN-LT-LS can be used on behalf of lead-based piezo-ceramics.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Structural variation and piezoelectric properties of 0.95(Na0.5K0.5)NbO3-0.05BaTiO3 ceramics [J].
Ahn, Cheol-Woo ;
Park, Hwi-Yeol ;
Nahm, Sahn ;
Uchino, Kenji ;
Lee, Hyeung-Gyu ;
Lee, Hwack-Joo .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2007, 136 (01) :255-260
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-3020-8
[3]   Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods [J].
Chatterjee, Prasenjit ;
Athawale, Vijay Manikrao ;
Chakraborty, Shankar .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2009, 30 (10) :4043-4053
[4]   Hard coating material selection using multi-criteria decision making [J].
Chauhan, Aditya ;
Vaish, Rahul .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2013, 44 :240-245
[5]   A comparative study on material selection for micro-electromechanical systems [J].
Chauhan, Aditya ;
Vaish, Rahul .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2012, 41 :177-181
[6]   Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach [J].
Chauhan, Aditya ;
Vaish, Rahul .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2012, 36 :1-5
[7]   Electromechanical properties and morphotropic phase boundary of Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-K0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics [J].
Chen, W ;
Li, YM ;
Xu, Q ;
Zhou, J .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROCERAMICS, 2005, 15 (03) :229-235
[8]   WHAT CAN BE EXPECTED FROM LEAD-FREE PIEZOELECTRIC MATERIALS? [J].
Damjanovic, Dragan ;
Klein, Naama ;
Li, Jin ;
Porokhonskyy, Viktor .
FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS LETTERS, 2010, 3 (01) :5-13
[9]   A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: Combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method [J].
Dehghan-Manshadi, B. ;
Mahmudi, H. ;
Abedian, A. ;
Mahmudi, R. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2007, 28 (01) :8-15
[10]   Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights [J].
Deng, H ;
Yeh, CH ;
Willis, RJ .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (10) :963-973