Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583]

被引:12
作者
Rahbari, Nuh N. [1 ]
Knebel, Phillip [1 ,7 ]
Kieser, Meinhard [2 ]
Bruckner, Thomas [2 ]
Bartsch, Detlef K. [3 ]
Friess, Helmut [4 ,5 ]
Mihaljevic, Andre L. [4 ,5 ]
Stern, Josef [6 ]
Diener, Markus K. [1 ,7 ]
Voss, Sabine [7 ]
Rossion, Inga [7 ]
Buechler, Markus W. [1 ]
Seiler, Christoph M. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplant Surg, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, IMBI, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Marburg, Dept Surg, Marburg, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Surg, D-80290 Munich, Germany
[5] CHIR Net Munich, D-80290 Munich, Germany
[6] St Josefs Hosp Dortmund, Dept Surg, Dortmund, Germany
[7] Study Ctr German Surg Soc SDGC, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
TRIALS | 2012年 / 13卷
关键词
INCISIONAL HERNIA; RISK-FACTORS; WOUND DEHISCENCE; BURST ABDOMEN; META-ANALYSIS; METAANALYSIS; INFECTION; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; FASCIA;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6215-13-72
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The optimal strategy for abdominal wall closure has been an issue of ongoing debate. Available studies do not specifically enroll patients who undergo emergency laparotomy and thus do not consider the distinct biological characteristics of these patients. The present randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly applied abdominal wall closure strategies in patients undergoing primary emergency midline laparotomy. Methods/design: The CONTINT trial is a multicenter, open label, randomized controlled trial with a two-group parallel design. Patients undergoing a primary emergency midline laparotomy are enrolled in the trial. The two most commonly applied strategies of abdominal wall closure after midline laparotomy are compared: the continuous, all-layer suture technique using slowly absorbable monofilament material (two Monoplus (R) loops) and the interrupted suture technique using rapidly absorbable braided material (Vicryl (R) sutures). The primary endpoint within the CONTINT trial is an incisional hernia within 12 months or a burst abdomen within 30 days after surgery. As reliable data on this primary endpoint is not available for patients undergoing emergency surgery, an adaptive interim analysis will be conducted after the inclusion of 80 patients, allowing early termination of the trial if necessary or modification of design characteristics such as recalculation of sample size. Discussion: This is a randomized controlled multicenter trial with a two-group parallel design to assess the efficacy and safety of two commonly applied abdominal wall closure strategies in patients undergoing primary emergency midline laparotomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy: CONTINT: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00544583]
    Polychronidis, Georgios
    Rahbari, Nuh N.
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Sander, Anja
    Sommer, Florian
    Usta, Selami
    Hermann, Janssen
    Albers, Max Benjamin
    Sargut, Mine
    Knebel, Phillip
    Klotz, Rosa
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [2] Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583]
    Nuh N Rahbari
    Phillip Knebel
    Meinhard Kieser
    Thomas Bruckner
    Detlef K Bartsch
    Helmut Friess
    Andre L Mihaljevic
    Josef Stern
    Markus K Diener
    Sabine Voss
    Inga Rossion
    Markus W Büchler
    Christoph M Seiler
    Trials, 13
  • [3] Continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy: CONTINT: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00544583]
    Georgios Polychronidis
    Nuh N. Rahbari
    Thomas Bruckner
    Anja Sander
    Florian Sommer
    Selami Usta
    Janssen Hermann
    Max Benjamin Albers
    Mine Sargut
    Phillip Knebel
    Rosa Klotz
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 18
  • [4] Continuous and interrupted abdominal-wall closure after primary emergency midline laparotomy (CONIAC-trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled single centre trial
    Wolf, Sebastian
    de Gracia, Luis Arbona
    Sommer, Florian
    Schrempf, Matthias Christian
    Anthuber, Matthias
    Vlasenko, Dmytro
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [5] Hughes Abdomen Closure Technique Versus Continuous Closure in Emergency Midline Laparotomy: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Murthy, Kishor
    Neogi, Sushanto
    Roy, Sarmista
    Vats, Manu
    Meena, Rinki
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [6] Interrupted versus continuous fascial closure in patients undergoing emergent laparotomy: A randomized controlled trial
    Peponis, Thomas
    Bohnen, Jordan D.
    Muse, Sandra
    Fuentes, Eva
    van der Wilden, Gwendolyn M.
    Mejaddam, Ali
    Alam, Hasan
    Kaafarani, Haytham M. A.
    Fagenholz, Peter J.
    King, David R.
    Yeh, D. Dante
    Velmahos, George C.
    de Moya, Marc A.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2018, 85 (03) : 459 - 465
  • [7] PREBIOUS trial: A multicenter randomized controlled trial of PREventive midline laparotomy closure with a BIOabsorbable mesh for the prevention of incisional hernia: Rationale and design
    Lopez-Cano, Manuel
    Pereira, Jose A.
    Lozoya, Roberto
    Feliu, Xavier
    Villalobos, Rafael
    Navarro, Salvador
    Antonia Arbos, Maria
    Armengol-Carrasco, Manuel
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 39 (02) : 335 - 341
  • [8] Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of MonoMaxA® suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy-a controlled prospective multicentre trial: ISSAAC [NCT005725079]
    Albertsmeier, Markus
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    Fischer, Lars
    Baumann, Petra
    Huesing, Johannes
    Seidlmayer, Christoph
    Franck, Annette
    Jauch, Karl-Walter
    Knaebel, Hanns-Peter
    Buechler, Markus W.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 397 (03) : 363 - 371
  • [9] Interrupted or Continuous Slowly Absorbable Sutures For Closure of Primary Elective Midline Abdominal Incisions A Multicenter Randomized Trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023S41)
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Diener, Markus K.
    Papyan, Armine
    Golcher, Henriette
    Seidlmayer, Christoph
    Franck, Annette
    Kieser, Meinhard
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Knaebel, Hanns-Peter
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 249 (04) : 576 - 582
  • [10] Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of MonoMax® suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy—a controlled prospective multicentre trial: ISSAAC [NCT005725079]
    Markus Albertsmeier
    Christoph M. Seiler
    Lars Fischer
    Petra Baumann
    Johannes Hüsing
    Christoph Seidlmayer
    Annette Franck
    Karl-Walter Jauch
    Hanns-Peter Knaebel
    Markus W. Büchler
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2012, 397 : 363 - 371