Practicable confidence intervals for current status data

被引:5
作者
Choi, Byeong Yeob [2 ]
Fine, Jason P. [2 ]
Brookhart, M. Alan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
binary isotonic regression; bootstrap; confidence interval; current status data; transformation; Wald-based confidence interval; SURVIVAL FUNCTION; COMPETING RISKS; INFERENCE; BANDS;
D O I
10.1002/sim.5609
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Although confidence intervals (CIs) for binary isotonic regression and current status survival data have been well studied theoretically, their practical application has been limited, in part because of poor performance in small samples and in part because of computational difficulties. Ghosh, Banerjee, and Biswas (2008, Biometrics 64, 1009-1017) described three approaches to constructing CIs: (i) the Wald-based method; (ii) the subsampling-based method; and (iii) the likelihood-ratio test (LRT)-based method. In simulation studies, they found that the subsampling-based method and LRT-based method tend to have better coverage probabilities than a simple Wald-based method that may perform poorly in realistic sample sizes. However, software implementing these approaches is currently unavailable. In this article, we show that by using transformations, simple Wald-based CIs can be improved with small and moderate sample sizes to have competitive performance with LRT-based method. Our simulations further show that a simple nonparametric bootstrap gives approximately correct CIs for the data generating mechanisms that we consider. We provide an R package that can be used to compute the Wald-type and the bootstrap CIs and demonstrate its practical utility with two real data analyses. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1428
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Confidence intervals for current status data
    Banerjee, M
    Wellner, JA
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2005, 32 (03) : 405 - 424
  • [2] BIE O, 1987, SCAND J STAT, V14, P221
  • [3] BORGAN O, 1990, SCAND J STAT, V17, P35
  • [4] Inference for Constrained Estimation of Tumor Size Distributions
    Ghosh, Debashis
    Banerjee, Moulinath
    Biswas, Pinaki
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2008, 64 (04) : 1009 - 1017
  • [5] Computing Chernoff's distribution
    Groeneboom, P
    Wellner, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2001, 10 (02) : 388 - 400
  • [6] Groeneboom P, 1992, INFORM BOUNDS NONPAR
  • [7] HOEL DG, 1972, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V49, P361
  • [8] Nonparametric estimation from current status data with competing risks
    Jewell, NP
    Van der Laan, M
    Henneman, T
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 2003, 90 (01) : 183 - 197
  • [9] Keiding N, 1996, Lifetime Data Anal, V2, P119, DOI 10.1007/BF00128570
  • [10] Nonparametric inference for competing risks current status data with continuous, discrete or grouped observation times
    Maathuis, M. H.
    Hudgens, M. G.
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 2011, 98 (02) : 325 - 340