Variations in constrained retrieval

被引:18
作者
Alban, Michael W. [1 ]
Kelley, Colleen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
Memory; Recognition; Recollection; Context effects; Word recognition; RECOGNITION MEMORY; OLDER-ADULTS; DEPTH; OPERATIONS; INFORMATION; REPETITION; CRITERION; STRENGTH; MATCH;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-012-0185-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Mentally reinstating encoding operations at retrieval might improve access to memories; however, such constrained retrieval is an effortful process that may not always be used. The memory-for-foils procedure (Jacoby, Shimizu, Daniels, & Rhodes, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 852-857, 2005) infers participant-initiated mental reinstatement of encoding operations during attempts at recognition from the differential memory that accrues to foils during a test of deeply processed items versus during a test of shallowly processed items, as indicated by performance on a final recognition memory test for the foils. Experiment 1 tested whether differential memory for foils is due to the evocation of task context during recollection of neighboring old items. Experiment 2 tested whether inducing a set to respond without much effort on a prior recognition test affects the likelihood of constrained retrieval on later tests. Experiment 3 tested whether constrained retrieval is less likely to occur when the deep versus shallow source of test items is intermixed, rather than blocked in separate tests. These experiments provide evidence that people query memory by mentally reinstating encoding operations and identify conditions that affect the probability of constrained retrieval.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 692
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Alban M. W., 2010, THESIS
[2]   Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring [J].
Bayen, UJ ;
Murnane, K ;
Erdfelder, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (01) :197-215
[3]   Distractor plausibility and criterion placement in recognition [J].
Benjamin, AS ;
Bawa, S .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2004, 51 (02) :159-172
[4]   Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Strategic Retrieval Processing [J].
Bridger, Emma K. ;
Herron, Jane E. ;
Elward, Rachael L. ;
Wilding, Edward L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2009, 35 (05) :1175-1186
[5]   Modeling experimentally induced strategy shifts [J].
Brown, Scott ;
Steyvers, Mark ;
Hemmer, Pernille .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (01) :40-45
[6]   Encoding processes during retrieval tasks [J].
Buckner, RL ;
Wheeler, ME ;
Sheridan, MA .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (03) :406-415
[7]   Confabulation and the control of recollection [J].
Burgess, PW ;
Shallice, T .
MEMORY, 1996, 4 (04) :359-411
[8]   THE MRC PSYCHOLINGUISTIC DATABASE [J].
COLTHEART, M .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 33 (NOV) :497-505
[9]  
Craik F.I. M., 1977, ATTENTION PERFORM, P679
[10]   Source-constrained retrieval influences the encoding of new information [J].
Danckert, Stacey L. ;
MacLeod, Colin M. ;
Fernandes, Myra A. .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2011, 39 (08) :1374-1386