Non-controlling large shareholders in emerging markets: Evidence from China

被引:56
作者
Cheng, Minying [1 ]
Lin, Bingxuan [2 ,4 ]
Lu, Rui [3 ]
Wei, Minghai [4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Int Sch Business & Finance, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Rhode Isl, Coll Business Adm, Kingston, RI USA
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Lingnan Coll, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Business, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ownership structure; Large shareholder monitoring; Insider trading; MULTIPLE LARGE SHAREHOLDERS; SHARE STRUCTURE REFORM; STOCK OPTION AWARDS; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FAMILY OWNERSHIP; BALANCE-SHEET; EARNINGS; COST; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.09.010
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Non-controlling large shareholders play an important role in corporate governance in emerging markets where controlling shareholder expropriation is a major concern. We argue that noncontrolling large shareholders are faced with two non-conflicting incentives: to take advantage of their information advantage and obtain positive abnormal returns when they trade company shares, and to serve as effective monitors and minimize controlling shareholders' appropriation of company wealth. Using a sample of large shareholders' selling events upon the expiration of the lockup period following the split-share structure reform in China, we find that non-controlling large shareholders successfully time the market, as shown by their positive abnormal returns when selling their shares. Their returns are higher if they have a greater information advantage. Furthermore, the positive returns of the controlling large shareholder are negatively related to non-controlling large shareholders ownership, suggesting that non-controlling large shareholders play a monitoring role and prevent controlling shareholders from looting the company. We also show that large shareholders affiliated with the controlling shareholders are not subject to as high a level of monitoring as those controlling shareholders are. Furthermore, both firm opaqueness and the severity of agency cost affect the quality of non-controlling large shareholders monitoring. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures [J].
Aboody, D ;
Kasznik, R .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2000, 29 (01) :73-100
[2]   Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (03) :1301-1328
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, WORKING PAPER
[4]  
Arshadi N., 1993, The law and finance of corporate insider trading: theory and evidence
[5]   Multiple large shareholders, control contests, and implied cost of equity [J].
Attig, Najah ;
Guedhami, Omrane ;
Mishra, Dev .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2008, 14 (05) :721-737
[6]   Modeling Discretionary Accrual Reversal and the Balance Sheet as an Earnings Management Constraint [J].
Baber, William R. ;
Kang, Sok-Hyon ;
Li, Ying .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2011, 86 (04) :1189-1212
[7]   The balance sheet as an earnings management constraint [J].
Barton, J ;
Simko, PJ .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2002, 77 :1-27
[8]   Private information, earnings manipulations, and executive stock-option exercises [J].
Bartov, E ;
Mohanram, P .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2004, 79 (04) :889-920
[9]   Insider trading, earnings quality, and accrual mispricing [J].
Beneish, MD ;
Vargus, ME .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2002, 77 (04) :755-791
[10]  
Bortolotti Bernardo., 2006, The Nontradable Share Reform in the Chinese Stock Market