Maximizing the probability of satisfying the clinical goals in radiation therapy treatment planning under setup uncertainty

被引:23
作者
Fredriksson, Albin [1 ]
Forsgren, Anders [2 ]
Hardemark, Bjorn [1 ]
机构
[1] RaySearch Labs, SE-11134 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Math, Optimizat & Syst Theory, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
IMRT; IMPT; optimization; robustness; uncertainty; MODULATED PROTON THERAPY; WORST-CASE OPTIMIZATION; MARGIN; RADIOTHERAPY; SENSITIVITY; ERRORS; RANGE; PTV;
D O I
10.1118/1.4921998
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This paper introduces a method that maximizes the probability of satisfying the clinical goals in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments subject to setup uncertainty. Methods: The authors perform robust optimization in which the clinical goals are constrained to be satisfied whenever the setup error falls within an uncertainty set. The shape of the uncertainty set is included as a variable in the optimization. The goal of the optimization is to modify the shape of the uncertainty set in order to maximize the probability that the setup error will fall within the modified set. Because the constraints enforce the clinical goals to be satisfied under all setup errors within the uncertainty set, this is equivalent to maximizing the probability of satisfying the clinical goals. This type of robust optimization is studied with respect to photon and proton therapy applied to a prostate case and compared to robust optimization using an a priori defined uncertainty set. Results: Slight reductions of the uncertainty sets resulted in plans that satisfied a larger number of clinical goals than optimization with respect to a priori defined uncertainty sets, both within the reduced uncertainty sets and within the a priori, nonreduced, uncertainty sets. For the prostate case, the plans taking reduced uncertainty sets into account satisfied 1.4 (photons) and 1.5 (protons) times as many clinical goals over the scenarios as the method taking a priori uncertainty sets into account. Conclusions: Reducing the uncertainty sets enabled the optimization to find better solutions with respect to the errors within the reduced as well as the nonreduced uncertainty sets and thereby achieve higher probability of satisfying the clinical goals. This shows that asking for a little less in the optimization sometimes leads to better overall plan quality. (C) 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:3992 / 3999
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Analytical probabilistic modeling for radiation therapy treatment planning [J].
Bangert, Mark ;
Hennig, Philipp ;
Oelfke, Uwe .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (16) :5401-5419
[2]   Probabilistic objective functions for margin-less IMRT planning [J].
Bohoslavsky, Roman ;
Witte, Marnix G. ;
Janssen, Tomas M. ;
van Herk, Marcel .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (11) :3563-3580
[3]   Advantages and limitations of the 'worst case scenario' approach in IMPT treatment planning [J].
Casiraghi, M. ;
Albertini, F. ;
Lomax, A. J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (05) :1323-1339
[4]   A robust approach to IMRT optimization [J].
Chan, TCY ;
Bortfeld, T ;
Tsitsiklis, JN .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (10) :2567-2583
[5]   Optimal margin and edge-enhanced intensity maps in the presence of motion and uncertainty [J].
Chan, Timothy C. Y. ;
Tsitsiklis, John N. ;
Bortfeld, Thomas .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (02) :515-533
[6]   A critical evaluation of worst case optimization methods for robust intensity-modulated proton therapy planning [J].
Fredriksson, Albin ;
Bokrantz, Rasmus .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) :48-58
[7]   A characterization of robust radiation therapy treatment planning methods-from expected value to worst case optimization [J].
Fredriksson, Albin .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (08) :5169-5181
[8]   Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy [J].
Fredriksson, Albin ;
Forsgren, Anders ;
Hardemark, Bjorn .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (03) :1672-1684
[9]   SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization (Reprinted from SIAM Journal Optimization, vol 12, pg 979-1006, 2002) [J].
Gill, PE ;
Murray, W ;
Saunders, MA .
SIAM REVIEW, 2005, 47 (01) :99-131
[10]   Coverage optimized planning: Probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria [J].
Gordon, J. J. ;
Sayah, N. ;
Weiss, E. ;
Siebers, J. V. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (02) :550-563