Initial results of robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

被引:5
作者
Trugeda Carrera, Ma Soledad [1 ]
Jose Fernandez-Diaz, Ma [1 ]
Carlos Rodriguez-Sanjuan, Juan [1 ]
Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos, Jose [1 ]
de Diego Garcia, Ernesto Matias [1 ]
Gomez-Fleitas, Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cantabria, Unidad Cirugia Esofagogastr, Serv Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digest, Hosp Univ Marques Valdecilla, E-39005 Santander, Spain
来源
CIRUGIA ESPANOLA | 2015年 / 93卷 / 06期
关键词
Esophageal cancer; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Thoracoscopy; Robotic surgery; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; EARLY EXPERIENCE; PRONE POSITION; MOBILIZATION; SURGERY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; ANASTOMOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ciresp.2015.01.002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: There is scant experience with robot-assisted esophagectomy in cases of esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer. Our aim is to report our current experience. Patients and methods: Observational cohort study of the first 32 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from September 2011 to June 2014. The gastric tube was created laparoscopically. In the thoracic field, a robot-assisted thoracoscopic approach was performed in the prone position with intrathoracic robotic hand-sewn anastomosis. Patient and tumour characteristics, surgical technique, short-term outcomes (morbidity and mortality) and oncological results (radicality and number of removed nodes) were evaluated. Results: Thirty-two patients, with a mean age of 58 years (34-74) were treated by a totally minimally invasive esophagectomy: robotic laparoscopy and thoracoscopy (11 McKeown and 21 Ivor-Lewis). Twenty-nine received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. There were no conversions to open surgery. Console time was 218 minutes (190-285). Blood loss was 170 ml (40-255). One patient died from cardiac disease. Nine patients had a major complication (Dindo-Clavien grade II or higher). There was no case of respiratory complication or recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Five patients had intrathoracic fistula, 4 radiological and one clinical. Three had chylothorax, 2 cervical fistula and one gastric tube necrosis. The median hospital stay was 12 days (8-50). All the resections were R0 and the median of removed lymph nodes was 16 (2-23). Conclusions: Our results suggest that minimally invasive esophagectomy with robot-assisted thoracoscopy is safe and achieves oncological standards. (C) 2014 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 402
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with a cervical or abdominal incision to extract specimen
    Hu, Zhi-Hao
    Li, Rui-Xin
    Wang, Jing-Tao
    Wang, Guo-Jun
    Deng, Xiu-Mei
    Zhu, Tian-Yu
    Gao, Bu-Lang
    Zhang, Yun-Fei
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (43)
  • [22] Esophagectomy for the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer
    Tomaszek, Sandra
    Cassivi, Stephen D.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 38 (01) : 169 - +
  • [23] Effective Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using Slender Tracheal Forceps in Prone Position Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy
    Nakajima, Masanobu
    Takahashi, Masakazu
    Domeki, Yasushi
    Satomura, Hitoshi
    Muroi, Hiroto
    Kikuchi, Maiko
    Ogata, Hideo
    Yamaguchi, Satoru
    Sasaki, Kinro
    Sakai, Makoto
    Sohda, Makoto
    Miyazaki, Tatsuya
    Kuwano, Hiroyuki
    Kato, Hiroyuki
    IN VIVO, 2016, 30 (06): : 893 - 898
  • [24] Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer
    Huang, Hai-Tao
    Wang, Fei
    Shen, Liang
    Xia, Chun-Qiu
    Lu, Chen-Xi
    Zhong, Chong-Jun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 13
  • [25] Minimally invasive treatment of esophageal cancer: Laparoscopic staging to robotic esophagectomy
    Espat, NJ
    Jacobsen, G
    Horgan, S
    Donahue, P
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [26] Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Is it truly less invasive?
    Oshikiri, Taro
    Takiguchi, Gosuke
    Miura, Susumu
    Takase, Nobuhisa
    Hasegawa, Hiroshi
    Yamamoto, Masashi
    Kanaji, Shingo
    Yamashita, Kimihiro
    Matsuda, Yoshiko
    Matsuda, Takeru
    Nakamura, Tetsu
    Suzuki, Satoshi
    Kakeji, Yoshihiro
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2019, 3 (02): : 138 - 145
  • [27] Outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position with laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophageal cancer
    Kitagawa, Hiroyuki
    Namikawa, Tsutomu
    Munekage, Masaya
    Fujisawa, Kazune
    Munekgae, Eri
    Kobayashi, Michiya
    Hanazaki, Kazuhiro
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2016, 401 (05) : 699 - 705
  • [28] Risk factors and measures of pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
    Ohi, Masaki
    Toiyama, Yuji
    Omura, Yusuke
    Ichikawa, Takashi
    Yasuda, Hiromi
    Okugawa, Yoshinaga
    Fujikawa, Hiroyuki
    Okita, Yoshiki
    Yoshiyama, Shigeyuki
    Hiro, Junichiro
    Araki, Toshimitsu
    Kusunoki, Masato
    SURGERY TODAY, 2019, 49 (02) : 176 - 186
  • [29] Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer
    Chowdappa, Ramachandra
    Dharanikota, Anvesh
    Arjunan, Ravi
    Althaf, Syed
    Premalata, Chennagiri S.
    Ranganath, Namrata
    SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 10 (04) : 230 - 235
  • [30] Outcomes of robotic esophagectomy
    Young, Amy
    Alvarez Gallesio, Ose Maria
    Sewell, David B.
    Carr, Rebecca
    Molena, Daniela
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2021, 13 (10) : 6163 - 6168