How Does Children's Theory of Mind Become Explicit? A Review of Longitudinal Findings

被引:38
作者
Sodian, Beate [1 ]
Kristen-Antonow, Susanne [1 ]
Kloo, Daniela [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Psychol, Leopoldstr 13, D-80802 Munich, Germany
关键词
infancy; psychological reasoning; conceptual continuity; MORALLY-RELEVANT THEORY; FALSE-BELIEF; SOCIAL COGNITION; INFANT ATTENTION; JOINT ATTENTION; IMPLICIT; INTENTIONS; ENCODE; CONTINUITY; CHILDHOOD;
D O I
10.1111/cdep.12381
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
How does theory of mind become explicit? In this article, we provide a brief overview of theoretical accounts and then review longitudinal findings on the development of theory of mind from infancy to the preschool years. Long-term predictive relations among conceptually related measures of implicit and explicit theory-of-mind reasoning support a conceptual continuity view of the transition from an implicit to an explicit understanding of the mind. We discuss alternative, minimalist accounts of infant psychological reasoning (e.g., two-systems models, submentalizing theory) and their implications for the development of theory of mind in light of the evidence. Longitudinal findings further support a developmental enrichment view of joint attention as a foundation of theory of mind and early social interaction as a powerful mechanism in the development of this ability. Finally, we highlight the importance of longitudinal data for our understanding of conceptual development from infancy to the preschool years.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 177
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   The link between infant attention to goal-directed action and later theory of mind abilities [J].
Aschersleben, Gisa ;
Hofer, Tanja ;
Jovanovic, Bianca .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2008, 11 (06) :862-868
[2]   False-belief understanding in infants [J].
Baillargeon, Rene ;
Scott, Rose M. ;
He, Zijing .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (03) :110-118
[3]   Invited Commentary: Interpreting failed replications of early false-belief findings: Methodological and theoretical considerations [J].
Baillargeon, Renee ;
Buttelmann, David ;
Southgate, Victoria .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 46 :112-124
[4]   Psychological Reasoning in Infancy [J].
Baillargeon, Renee ;
Scott, Rose M. ;
Bian, Lin .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 67, 2016, 67 :159-186
[5]   Connecting the dots from infancy to childhood: A longitudinal study connecting gaze following, language, and explicit theory of mind [J].
Brooks, Rechele ;
Meltzoff, Andrew N. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 130 :67-78
[6]   Social cognition and social responsiveness in 10-month-old infants [J].
Brune, Camille W. ;
Woodward, Amanda L. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 8 (02) :133-158
[7]   How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind [J].
Butterfill, Stephen A. ;
Apperly, Ian A. .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 2013, 28 (05) :606-637
[8]   The role of declarative pointing in developing a theory of mind [J].
Camaioni, L ;
Perucchini, P ;
Bellagamba, F ;
Colonnesi, C .
INFANCY, 2004, 5 (03) :291-308
[9]   Relations Between False Belief Understanding and Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Devine, Rory T. ;
Hughes, Claire .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 85 (05) :1777-1794
[10]   How (not) to measure infant Theory of Mind: Testing the replicability and validity of four non-verbal measures [J].
Doerrenberg, Sebastian ;
Rakoczy, Hannes ;
Liszkowski, Ulf .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 46 :12-30