Decision Coaching to Prepare Patients for Making Health Decisions: A Systematic Review of Decision Coaching in Trials of Patient Decision Aids

被引:118
|
作者
Stacey, Dawn [1 ,2 ]
Kryworuchko, Jennifer [3 ]
Bennett, Carol [2 ]
Murray, Mary Ann [2 ]
Mullan, Sarah [2 ]
Legare, France [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Nursing, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Univ Quebec, Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
health literacy; decision aids; prostate cancer; colorectal cancer; cancer prevention; breast cancer/mammography; oncology; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; SUPPORT PATIENTS; CARE; INTERVENTION; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; EDUCATION; CRITERIA; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X12443311
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Decision coaching is individualized, nondirective facilitation of patient preparation for shared decision making. Purpose. To explore characteristics and effectiveness of decision coaching evaluated within trials of patient decision aids (PtDAs) for health decisions. Data Sources. A subanalysis of trials included in the 2011 Cochrane Review of PtDAs. Study Selection. Eligible trials allowed the effectiveness of decision coaching to be compared with another intervention and/or usual care. Data Extraction. Two reviewers independently screened 86 trials, extracted data, and appraised quality. Data Synthesis. Ten trials were eligible. Decision coaching was provided by genetic counselors, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, psychologists, or health educators. Coaching compared with usual care (n = 1 trial) improved knowledge. Coaching plus PtDA compared with usual care (n = 4) improved knowledge and participation in decision making without reported dissatisfaction. Coaching compared with PtDA alone (n = 4) increased values-choice agreement and improved satisfaction with the decision-making process without any difference in knowledge or participation in decision making. Coaching plus PtDA compared with PtDA alone (n = 4) had no difference in knowledge, values-choice agreement, participation in decision making, or satisfaction with the process. Decision coaching plus PtDA was more cost-effective compared with PtDA alone or usual care (n = 1). Limitations. Methodological quality, number of trials, and description of decision coaching. Conclusions. Compared with usual care, decision coaching improved knowledge. However, the improvement in knowledge was similar when coaching was compared with PtDA alone. Outcomes for other comparisons are more variable, some trials showing positive effects and other trials reporting no difference. Given the small number of trials and variability in results, further research is required to determine the effectiveness of decision coaching.
引用
收藏
页码:E22 / E33
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Co-production of a systematic review on decision coaching: a mixed methods case study within a review
    Jull, Janet
    Smith, Maureen
    Carley, Meg
    Stacey, Dawn
    Graham, Ian D.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [42] Decision aids to facilitate decision making around behavior change in the field of health promotion: A scoping review
    Gultzow, Thomas
    Zijlstra, Danielle N.
    Bolman, Catherine
    de Vries, Hein
    Dirksen, Carmen D.
    Muris, Jean W. M.
    Smit, Eline S.
    Hoving, Ciska
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (06) : 1266 - 1285
  • [43] Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference-sensitivity and personal motives
    Korger, Simone
    Eggeling, Marie
    Cress, Ulrike
    Kimmerle, Joachim
    Bientzle, Martina
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (02) : 257 - 268
  • [44] Addressing Health Literacy in Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards
    Muscat, Danielle M.
    Smith, Jenna
    Mac, Olivia
    Cadet, Tamara
    Giguere, Anik
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Langford, Aisha T.
    Smith, Sian
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 848 - 869
  • [45] Effects of Shared Decision Making on Distress and Health Care Utilization Among Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Geerse, Olaf P.
    Stegmann, Mariken E.
    Kerstjens, Huib A. M.
    Hiltermann, Thijo Jeroen N.
    Bakitas, Marie
    Zimmermann, Camilla
    Deal, Allison M.
    Brandenbarg, Daan
    Berger, Marjolein Y.
    Berendsen, Annette J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 56 (06) : 975 - +
  • [46] A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness of decision aids for vaccination decision-making
    Vujovich-Dunn, Cassandra
    Kaufman, Jessica
    King, Catherine
    Skinner, S. Rachel
    Wand, Handan
    Guy, Rebecca
    Leask, Julie
    VACCINE, 2021, 39 (28) : 3655 - 3665
  • [47] Availability and effectiveness of decision aids for supporting shared decision making in patients with advanced colorectal and lung cancer: Results from a systematic review
    Spronk, Inge
    Meijers, Maartje C.
    Heins, Marianne J.
    Francke, Anneke L.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    van Lindert, Anne
    van Dulmen, Sandra
    van Vliet, Liesbeth M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2019, 28 (03)
  • [48] Impact of Decision Aids on Screening Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis
    Adeli, Mahin
    Zayeri, Farid
    Rasekhi, Aliakbar
    Kiani, Zahra
    Amini, Payam
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 26 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [49] Decision Aids: The Effect of Labeling Options on Patient Choices and Decision Making
    Dolan, James G.
    Cherkasky, Olena A.
    Chin, Nancy
    Veazie, Peter J.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (08) : 979 - 986
  • [50] Balancing the presentation of information and options in patient decision aids: an updated review
    Abhyankar, Purva
    Volk, Robert J.
    Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer
    Bravo, Paulina
    Buchholz, Angela
    Ozanne, Elissa
    Vidal, Dale Colins
    Col, Nananda
    Stalmeier, Peep
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13