Decision Coaching to Prepare Patients for Making Health Decisions: A Systematic Review of Decision Coaching in Trials of Patient Decision Aids

被引:118
|
作者
Stacey, Dawn [1 ,2 ]
Kryworuchko, Jennifer [3 ]
Bennett, Carol [2 ]
Murray, Mary Ann [2 ]
Mullan, Sarah [2 ]
Legare, France [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Nursing, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Univ Quebec, Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
health literacy; decision aids; prostate cancer; colorectal cancer; cancer prevention; breast cancer/mammography; oncology; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; SUPPORT PATIENTS; CARE; INTERVENTION; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; EDUCATION; CRITERIA; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X12443311
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Decision coaching is individualized, nondirective facilitation of patient preparation for shared decision making. Purpose. To explore characteristics and effectiveness of decision coaching evaluated within trials of patient decision aids (PtDAs) for health decisions. Data Sources. A subanalysis of trials included in the 2011 Cochrane Review of PtDAs. Study Selection. Eligible trials allowed the effectiveness of decision coaching to be compared with another intervention and/or usual care. Data Extraction. Two reviewers independently screened 86 trials, extracted data, and appraised quality. Data Synthesis. Ten trials were eligible. Decision coaching was provided by genetic counselors, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, psychologists, or health educators. Coaching compared with usual care (n = 1 trial) improved knowledge. Coaching plus PtDA compared with usual care (n = 4) improved knowledge and participation in decision making without reported dissatisfaction. Coaching compared with PtDA alone (n = 4) increased values-choice agreement and improved satisfaction with the decision-making process without any difference in knowledge or participation in decision making. Coaching plus PtDA compared with PtDA alone (n = 4) had no difference in knowledge, values-choice agreement, participation in decision making, or satisfaction with the process. Decision coaching plus PtDA was more cost-effective compared with PtDA alone or usual care (n = 1). Limitations. Methodological quality, number of trials, and description of decision coaching. Conclusions. Compared with usual care, decision coaching improved knowledge. However, the improvement in knowledge was similar when coaching was compared with PtDA alone. Outcomes for other comparisons are more variable, some trials showing positive effects and other trials reporting no difference. Given the small number of trials and variability in results, further research is required to determine the effectiveness of decision coaching.
引用
收藏
页码:E22 / E33
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care: a systematic review
    Davies, Nathan
    Schiowitz, Brooke
    Rait, Greta
    Vickerstaff, Victoria
    Sampson, Elizabeth L.
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2019, 31 (10) : 1403 - 1419
  • [22] Decision aids for promoting shared decision-making: A review of systematic reviews
    Park, Myonghwa
    Doan, Thao Thi-Thu
    Jung, Jihye
    Giap, Thi-Thanh-Tinh
    Kim, Jinju
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2024, 26 (01)
  • [23] Patients or Volunteers? The Impact of Motivation for Trial Participation on the Efficacy of Patient Decision Aids: A Secondary Analysis of a Cochrane Systematic Review
    Brown, James G.
    Joyce, Kerry E.
    Stacey, Dawn
    Thomson, Richard G.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (04) : 419 - 435
  • [24] Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    van Weert, Julia C. M.
    van Munster, Barbara C.
    Sanders, Remco
    Spijker, Rene
    Hooft, Lotty
    Jansen, Jesse
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 16
  • [25] Shared decision making and patient decision aids in dermatology
    Tan, J.
    Linos, E.
    Sendelweck, M. A.
    van Zuuren, E. J.
    Ersser, S.
    Dellavalle, R. P.
    Williams, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 175 (05) : 1045 - 1048
  • [26] Decision aids for shared decision-making and appropriate anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Dan
    Zhou, Jie
    Fan, Tianli
    Chang, Jing
    Qiu, Yuzhen
    Zhuang, Zexiang
    Ma, Juanjuan
    Zeng, Li
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2022, 21 (02) : 97 - 106
  • [27] Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program
    Jeff Belkora
    Shelley Volz
    Meredith Loth
    Alexandra Teng
    Margot Zarin-Pass
    Dan Moore
    Laura Esserman
    BMC Health Services Research, 15
  • [28] Use of Decision Aids with Minority Patients: a Systematic Review
    Nathan, Aviva G.
    Marshall, Imani M.
    Cooper, Jennifer M.
    Huang, Elbert S.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (06) : 663 - 676
  • [29] What information is used in treatment decision aids? A systematic review of the types of evidence populating health decision aids
    Clifford, Amanda M.
    Ryan, Jean
    Walsh, Cathal
    McCurtin, Arlene
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2017, 17
  • [30] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Decision Aids for Socially Disadvantaged Populations: Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IDPAS)
    Yen, Renata W.
    Smith, Jenna
    Engel, Jaclyn
    Muscat, Danielle Marie
    Smith, Sian K.
    Mancini, Julien
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    Elwyn, Glyn
    O'Malley, A. James
    Leyenaar, JoAnna K.
    Mac, Olivia
    Cadet, Tamara
    Giguere, Anik
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Langford, Aisha
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 870 - 896