Decision Coaching to Prepare Patients for Making Health Decisions: A Systematic Review of Decision Coaching in Trials of Patient Decision Aids

被引:119
|
作者
Stacey, Dawn [1 ,2 ]
Kryworuchko, Jennifer [3 ]
Bennett, Carol [2 ]
Murray, Mary Ann [2 ]
Mullan, Sarah [2 ]
Legare, France [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Nursing, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Univ Quebec, Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
health literacy; decision aids; prostate cancer; colorectal cancer; cancer prevention; breast cancer/mammography; oncology; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; SUPPORT PATIENTS; CARE; INTERVENTION; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; EDUCATION; CRITERIA; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X12443311
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Decision coaching is individualized, nondirective facilitation of patient preparation for shared decision making. Purpose. To explore characteristics and effectiveness of decision coaching evaluated within trials of patient decision aids (PtDAs) for health decisions. Data Sources. A subanalysis of trials included in the 2011 Cochrane Review of PtDAs. Study Selection. Eligible trials allowed the effectiveness of decision coaching to be compared with another intervention and/or usual care. Data Extraction. Two reviewers independently screened 86 trials, extracted data, and appraised quality. Data Synthesis. Ten trials were eligible. Decision coaching was provided by genetic counselors, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, psychologists, or health educators. Coaching compared with usual care (n = 1 trial) improved knowledge. Coaching plus PtDA compared with usual care (n = 4) improved knowledge and participation in decision making without reported dissatisfaction. Coaching compared with PtDA alone (n = 4) increased values-choice agreement and improved satisfaction with the decision-making process without any difference in knowledge or participation in decision making. Coaching plus PtDA compared with PtDA alone (n = 4) had no difference in knowledge, values-choice agreement, participation in decision making, or satisfaction with the process. Decision coaching plus PtDA was more cost-effective compared with PtDA alone or usual care (n = 1). Limitations. Methodological quality, number of trials, and description of decision coaching. Conclusions. Compared with usual care, decision coaching improved knowledge. However, the improvement in knowledge was similar when coaching was compared with PtDA alone. Outcomes for other comparisons are more variable, some trials showing positive effects and other trials reporting no difference. Given the small number of trials and variability in results, further research is required to determine the effectiveness of decision coaching.
引用
收藏
页码:E22 / E33
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence
    Stacey, Dawn
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Belkora, Jeff
    Davison, B. Joyce
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    Eden, Karen B.
    Hoffman, Aubri S.
    Koerner, Mirjam
    Legare, France
    Loiselle, Marie-Chantal
    Street, Richard L., Jr.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
  • [2] Assessing the effectiveness of decision aids for decision making in prostate cancer testing: a systematic review
    Ilic, Dragan
    Jammal, Walid
    Chiarelli, Pauline
    Gardiner, Robert A.
    Hughes, Suzanne
    Stefanovic, Dana
    Chambers, Suzanne K.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1303 - 1315
  • [3] Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions
    Jull, Janet
    Koepke, Sascha
    Smith, Maureen
    Carley, Meg
    Finderup, Jeanette
    Rahn, Anne C.
    Boland, Laura
    Dunn, Sandra
    Dwyer, Andrew A.
    Kasper, Jurgen
    Kienlin, Simone Maria
    Legare, France
    Lewis, Krystina B.
    Lyddiatt, Anne
    Rutherford, Claudia
    Zhao, Junqiang
    Rader, Tamara
    Graham, Ian D.
    Stacey, Dawn
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, (11):
  • [4] Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: a systematic review
    Vlemmix, F.
    Warendorf, J. K.
    Rosman, A. N.
    Kok, M.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Morris, J. M.
    Nassar, N.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (03) : 257 - 266
  • [5] Guidance and/or Decision Coaching with Patient Decision Aids: Scoping Reviews to Inform the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS)
    Rahn, Anne Christin
    Jull, Janet
    Boland, Laura
    Finderup, Jeanette
    Loiselle, Marie-Chantal
    Smith, Maureen
    Koepke, Sascha
    Stacey, Dawn
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 938 - 953
  • [6] Understanding how and under what circumstances decision coaching works for people making healthcare decisions: a realist review
    Zhao, Junqiang
    Jull, Janet
    Finderup, Jeanette
    Smith, Maureen
    Kienlin, Simone Maria
    Rahn, Anne Christin
    Dunn, Sandra
    Aoki, Yumi
    Brown, Leanne
    Harvey, Gillian
    Stacey, Dawn
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [7] Patient Decision Aids to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Obstetrics and Gynecology A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Poprzeczny, Amanda J.
    Stocking, Katie
    Showell, Marian
    Duffy, James M. N.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (02) : 444 - 451
  • [8] Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program
    Belkora, Jeff
    Volz, Shelley
    Loth, Meredith
    Teng, Alexandra
    Zarin-Pass, Margot
    Moore, Dan
    Esserman, Laura
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [9] Systematic review of fertility preservation patient decision aids for cancer patients
    Wang, Yifan
    Anazodo, Antoinette
    Logan, Shanna
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (03) : 459 - 467
  • [10] A systematic review of decision aids for patients making a decision about treatment for early breast cancer
    Zdenkowski, Nicholas
    Butow, Phyllis
    Tesson, Stephanie
    Boyle, Frances
    BREAST, 2016, 26 : 31 - 45