Preservice teachers learning to teach proof through classroom implementation: Successes and challenges

被引:24
作者
Buchbinder, Orly [1 ]
McCrone, Sharon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Math & Stat, Durham, NH 03824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Reasoning and proof; Preservice secondary teachers; Mathematical knowledge for teaching; Practice-based teacher education; MATHEMATICAL KNOWLEDGE; FUTURE TEACHERS; OPPORTUNITIES; INSTRUCTION; EXAMPLES; LOGIC;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100779
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Proof and reasoning are central to learning mathematics with understanding. Yet proof is seen as challenging to teach and to learn. In a capstone course for preservice teachers, we developed instructional modules that guided prospective secondary mathematics teachers (PSTs) through a cycle of learning about the logical aspects of proof, then planning and implementing lessons in secondary classrooms that integrate these aspects with traditional mathematics curriculum in the United States. In this paper we highlight our framework on mathematical knowledge for teaching proof and focus on some of the logical aspects of proof that are seen as particularly challenging (four proof themes). We analyze 60 lesson plans, video recordings of a subset of 13 enacted lessons, and the PSTs' self- reported data to shed light on how the PSTs planned and enacted lessons that integrate these proof themes. The results provide insights into successes and challenges the PSTs encountered in this process and illustrate potential pathways for preparing PSTs to enact reasoning and proof in secondary classrooms. We also highlight the design principles for supporting the development of PSTs' mathematical knowledge for teaching proof.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Proof validation in real analysis: Inferring and checking warrants [J].
Alcock, Lara ;
Weber, Keith .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BEHAVIOR, 2005, 24 (02) :125-134
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EMS Newsletter, V82, P50
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, PRINC STAND SCH MATH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, COMMON CORE STATE ST
[5]   Indirect proof: what is specific to this way of proving? [J].
Antonini, Samuele ;
Mariotti, Maria Alessandra .
ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2008, 40 (03) :401-412
[6]  
Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, 2017, STANDARDS PREPARING
[7]  
Balacheff N., 2002, 2002 International conference on mathematics-understanding proving and proving to understand, P23
[8]  
Bruner J., 1960, The process of education
[9]  
Buchbinder O., 2019, P 11 C EUROPEAN SOC, P147
[10]  
Buchbinder O., 2018, P 21 ANN C RES UND M, P115