Factors influencing people's decision-making during three consecutive tornado events

被引:30
作者
Miran, Seyed M. [1 ]
Ling, Chen [1 ]
Rothfusz, Lans [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Akron, Dept Mech Engn, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[2] NOAA, Natl Severe Storms Lab, Norman, OK 73069 USA
关键词
Protective behavior; Tornado; Warnings; Natural hazards; Logistic regression; VULNERABILITY; WARNINGS; PREDICTORS; PERCEPTION; RESIDENTS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.034
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
On May 19th, 20th, and 31st 2013, three tornadoes with different intensities struck the Oklahoma City metropolitan area. A set of survey data was collected from residents in the area two months after the events. This study aims to explore the effects of different factors, the environmental context factor (proximity to the tornado's path), the information factor (number of weather information sources) as well as personal factors (age, marital status, gender, education, prior experience with tornadoes, type of geographical area- rural vs. urban-, and income), on people's protective action. For each of three tornado events, a multiple logistic regression model was built to identify the statistically significant factors on taking protective action by people. The results showed that only the factors of "proximity to the tornado" and "number of weather information sources" in all three models had significant effects on the odds of taking protective action. The likelihood of taking protective action when people were on the tornado's path was significantly higher than that of scenarios in which people were outside 5 miles of the tornado. Holding the other variables constant, adding one unit to the number of information sources increases the odds of taking protective action by 2.27 on average for the three events.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 157
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Community vulnerability to tropical cyclones: Cairns, 1996-2000 [J].
Anderson-Berry, LJ .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2003, 30 (02) :209-232
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, FORMAL OBSERVATION R
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Applied logistic regression
[4]   The 16 September 2015 Chile Tsunami from the Post-Tsunami Survey and Numerical Modeling Perspectives [J].
Aranguiz, Rafael ;
Gonzalez, Gabriel ;
Gonzalez, Juan ;
Catalan, Patricio A. ;
Cienfuegos, Rodrigo ;
Yagi, Yuji ;
Okuwaki, Ryo ;
Urra, Luisa ;
Contreras, Karla ;
Del Rio, Ian ;
Rojas, Camilo .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 173 (02) :333-348
[5]   Predictors for people's response to a tornado warning: Arkansas, 1 March 1997 [J].
Balluz, L ;
Schieve, L ;
Holmes, T ;
Kiezak, S ;
Malilay, J .
DISASTERS, 2000, 24 (01) :71-77
[6]   Statistics review 14: Logistic regression [J].
Bewick, V ;
Cheek, L ;
Ball, J .
CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 9 (01) :112-118
[7]  
Blanchard-Boehm R.D., 2004, INT RES GEOGRAPHICAL, V13, P38, DOI DOI 10.1080/10382040408668791
[8]   Public perception of flood risks, flood forecasting and mitigation [J].
Brilly, M ;
Polic, M .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2005, 5 (03) :345-355
[9]   Household Preparedness for Tornado Hazards: The 2011 Disaster in DeKalb County, Alabama [J].
Chaney, Philip L. ;
Weaver, Greg S. ;
Youngblood, Susan A. ;
Pitts, Kristin .
WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY, 2013, 5 (04) :345-358
[10]   THE HISTORY (AND FUTURE) OF TORNADO WARNING DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES [J].
Coleman, Timothy A. ;
Knupp, Kevin R. ;
Spann, James ;
Elliott, J. B. ;
Peters, Brian E. .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 92 (05) :567-582