Health benefits and costs of screening for colorectal cancer in people on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant

被引:13
|
作者
Wong, Germaine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Margaret W. Y. [1 ]
Howard, Kirsten [2 ]
Hua, Danny K. [1 ]
Chapman, Jeremy R. [3 ]
Bourke, Michael
Turner, Robin [2 ]
Tong, Allison [1 ,2 ]
Craig, Jonathan C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Ctr Kidney Res, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Westmead Hosp, Ctr Transplant & Renal Res, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
关键词
colorectal cancer screening; cost-effectiveness; cost-utility; chronic kidney disease; kidney transplantation; OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CHRONIC-RENAL-FAILURE; COLON-CANCER; SURVIVAL; RECIPIENTS; RISK; COLONOSCOPY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/gfs490
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Despite the higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in people with chronic kidney disease, it remains uncertain whether early detection through screening is cost-effective in this setting. We aimed to determine the costs and health benefits of CRC screening in people on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant. Using a government health perspective, three probabilistic Markov models were constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of annual immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) screening against no-screening in a cohort of 1000 patients (age 5070 years) on dialysis and with kidney transplants. A series of one-way, multi-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model structure and the extent in which the models assumptions were sensitive to the uncertainties within the input variables. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of CRC screening compared with no-screening were $138 828 per quality-adjusted life year [QALY; $122 977 per life year saved (LYS)], $121 973 per QALY ($ 85 095 per LYS) and $44 790 per QALY ($25 036 per LYS) for dialysis patients not listed on the transplant waiting list, patients on the transplant waiting list and patients with kidney transplants, respectively. The test specificity of iFOBT, the starting age of screening and cancer prevalence were influential factors that determined the overall cost-effectiveness of screening in this setting. Screening for CRC using iFOBT may reduce cancer-specific mortality in patients on dialysis and with kidney transplants. However, the benefits and costs of screening CRCs in patients on dialysis, especially for those deemed not suitable for transplantation, greatly exceeded the typical thresholds for acceptable cost-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 926
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Cancer Screening in People Who Have Chronic Disease: The Example of Kidney Disease
    Wong, Germaine
    Howard, Kirsten
    Tong, Allison
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2011, 24 (01) : 72 - 78
  • [2] Colorectal cancer screening: The costs and benefits of getting to 80% in every community
    Green, Beverly B.
    Meenan, Richard T.
    CANCER, 2020, 126 (18) : 4110 - 4113
  • [3] The benefits of cancer screening in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center experience
    Kato, Taigo
    Kakuta, Yoichi
    Abe, Toyofumi
    Yamanaka, Kazuaki
    Imamura, Ryoichi
    Okumi, Masayoshi
    Ichimaru, Naotsugu
    Takahara, Shiro
    Nonomura, Norio
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2016, 5 (02): : 153 - 158
  • [4] Dialysis patients have comparable results to patients who have received kidney transplant after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chou, Te-Feng Arthur
    Ma, Hsuan-Hsiao
    Tsai, Shang-Wen
    Chen, Cheng-Fong
    Wu, Po-Kuei
    Chen, Wei-Ming
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2021, 6 (08) : 618 - 628
  • [5] Risk factors for new-onset chronic kidney disease in patients who have received a liver transplant
    Li, Yuehong
    Li, Binbin
    Wang, Wei
    Lv, Jiaxuan
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (04) : 3589 - 3595
  • [6] Costs and Benefits of an Organized Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in the United States
    Guy, Gery P., Jr.
    Richardson, Lisa C.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    Plescia, Marcus
    CANCER, 2014, 120 (15) : 2308 - 2315
  • [7] Health Benefits and Cost-effectiveness of a Hybrid Screening Strategy for Colorectal Cancer
    Tuan Dinh
    Ladabaum, Uri
    Alperin, Peter
    Caldwell, Cindy
    Smith, Robert
    Levin, Theodore R.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 11 (09) : 1158 - 1166
  • [8] Correlates of Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among Men Who have been Screened for Prostate Cancer
    Wong, Yu-Ning
    Coups, Elliot J.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2011, 26 (02) : 301 - 307
  • [9] The Costs and Benefits of Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening Based On Phenotypic and Genetic Risk: A Health Economic Analysis
    Thomas, Chloe
    Mandrik, Olena
    Saunders, Catherine L.
    Thompson, Deborah
    Whyte, Sophie
    Griffin, Simon
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (08) : 811 - 821
  • [10] Colorectal Cancer Screening in People With and Without HIV in an Integrated Health Care Setting
    Lam, Jennifer O.
    Hurley, Leo B.
    Udaltsova, Natalia
    Alexeeff, Stacey E.
    Klein, Daniel B.
    Corley, Douglas A.
    Silverberg, Michael J.
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2019, 81 (03) : 284 - 291