Science-based stakeholder dialogues: Theories and tools

被引:128
作者
Welp, Martin [1 ]
de la Vega-Leinert, Anne
Stoll-Kleemann, Susanne
Jaeger, Carlo C.
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Inpact Res, Dept Global Change & Social Syst, POB 601203, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Inst Agr Econ & Social Sci, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2006年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
stakeholder dialogues; participation; global change research;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.12.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Science-based stakeholder dialogues are structured communication processes linking scientists with societal actors, such as representatives of companies, NGOs, governments, and the wider public. Stakeholders possess knowledge needed by scientists to better comprehend, represent and analyse global change problems as well as decision-makers', managers' and other stakeholders' mental models. We will examine the relevance of three theoretical frameworks for science-based stakeholder dialogues in the context of sustainability science. These are Rational Actor Paradigm, Bayesian Learning and Organisational Learning. All three contribute to a better theoretical framework for dialogue practice and the understanding of stakeholders as actors in society and in research in particular. Furthermore, these theories are important for tool development. A combination of analytical and communication tools is recommended to facilitate stakeholder dialogues. The paper refers to examples of dialogue practice gained in the European Climate Forum (ECF). (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 181
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG
[2]  
[Anonymous], INTEGRATED ASSESSMEN, DOI [10.1023/A:1011527523183, DOI 10.1023/A:1011527523183]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Nat. Resour. Forum, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1477-8947.2000.TB00925.X
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Fairness and competence in citizen participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ORG LEARNING LEARNIN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, REFLECTIONS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Governance and multi-stakeholder processes
[8]   Integrated global change scenarios:: surveying user needs in Finland [J].
Bärlund, I ;
Carter, TR .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2002, 12 (03) :219-229
[9]  
Bohm D., 1996, DIALOGUE-CAN PHILOS
[10]   CHARACTERIZING MENTAL MODELS OF HAZARDOUS PROCESSES - A METHODOLOGY AND AN APPLICATION TO RADON [J].
BOSTROM, A ;
FISCHHOFF, B ;
MORGAN, MG .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1992, 48 (04) :85-100