Removal of 17-β estradiol from wastewater: comparison between a laboratory scale conventional activated sludge and a membrane bioreactor

被引:6
|
作者
Lopez-Fernandez, R. [1 ]
Tavares, F. V. F. [1 ]
Gomez, M. [1 ]
Irusta, R. [2 ]
Le-Clech, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] CARTIF Ctr Tecnol, Environm Div, Valladolid 47151, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, Higher Tech Coll Ind Engn, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Technol, E-47011 Valladolid, Spain
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Chem Engn & Ind Chem, UNESCO Ctr Membrane Sci & Technol, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
17-beta estradiol; Membrane bioreactor; Conventional activated sludge; Sludge retention time; Statistics; TREATMENT PLANTS; RETENTION TIME; ESTROGENS; DEGRADATION; MBR;
D O I
10.1080/19443994.2013.734583
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This work reports the performance of a laboratory scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a conventional activated sludge (CAS) treating a real industrial-municipal mixed wastewater, spiked with 17-beta estradiol (E2) in micrograms amounts. In order to compare the steady-state conditions of both systems, different sludge retention times (SRT) of 10 and 20 days were applied, while the other operational parameters were maintained unchanged. Results regarding the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrogen and E2 have been assessed with statistics analysis using the Mann-Whitney test. MBR outperforms the CAS treatment in terms of COD and nitrogen removal, and the increase in the SRT generally improves the performance of each system. However, E2 was almost completely eliminated in both systems and SRTs applied, leading to removal rates above 99%. Thus, this study shows that the biological elimination of E2 is not directly related to the nitrification rate, and other process or operational parameters should be of importance.
引用
收藏
页码:2336 / 2342
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison between MBR and SBR on Anammox start-up process from the conventional activated sludge
    Wang, Tao
    Zhang, Hanmin
    Gao, Dawen
    Yang, Fenglin
    Zhang, Guangyi
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 122 : 78 - 82
  • [42] Fe3+addition as a promising strategy to enhance the pollutant removal performance and mitigate the membrane fouling of a laboratory-scale membrane bioreactor treating sulfamethoxazole wastewater
    Zhang, Lanhe
    Bai, Rumeng
    Zhang, Jian
    Chen, Zicheng
    Guo, Jingbo
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2025, 274
  • [43] Enhancing the removal of hazardous pollutants from coke-making wastewater by dosing activated carbon to a pilot-scale activated sludge process
    Raper, Eleanor
    Soares, Ana
    Chen, Jane
    Sutcliffe, Adam
    Aries, Eric
    Anderson, David
    Stephenson, Tom
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 92 (09) : 2325 - 2333
  • [44] Standardized application of yeast bioluminescent reporters as endocrine disruptor screen for comparative analysis of wastewater effluents from membrane bioreactor and traditional activated sludge
    Wang, Jun
    Eldridge, Melanie
    Menn, Fu-min
    Dykes, Todd
    Sayler, Gary
    ECOTOXICOLOGY, 2015, 24 (10) : 2088 - 2099
  • [45] Characterization and Comparison of Bacterial Communities Selected in Conventional Activated Sludge and Membrane Bioreactor Pilot Plants: A Focus on Nitrospira and Planctomycetes Bacterial Phyla
    Chiellini, Carolina
    Munz, Giulio
    Petroni, Giulio
    Lubello, Claudio
    Mori, Gualtiero
    Verni, Franco
    Vannini, Claudia
    CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 67 (01) : 77 - 90
  • [46] Performance evaluation of the bench-scale hybrid alternating aerobic/anoxic activated sludge-membrane bioreactor system for the wastewater treatment and reuse
    Park, Sangjin
    Park, Chang Min
    Kim, Do-Hyung
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2018, 125 : 16 - 25
  • [47] Investigation of Bacterial Diversity in Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional Activated Sludge Processes from Petroleum Refineries Using Phylogenetic and Statistical Approaches
    Silva, Cynthia C.
    Jesus, Ederson C.
    Torres, Ana P. R.
    Sousa, Maira P.
    Santiago, Vania M. J.
    Oliveira, Valeria M.
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 20 (03) : 447 - 459
  • [48] A comparison between extended aeration sludge and conventional activated sludge treatment for removal of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (Case study: Kermanshah and Paveh WWTP)
    Pirsaheb, Meghdad
    Khamutian, Razieh
    Khodadadian, Mehdi
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2014, 52 (25-27) : 4673 - 4680
  • [49] Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) as Alternative to a Conventional Activated Sludge System Followed by Ultrafiltration (CAS-UF) for the Treatment of Fischer-Tropsch Reaction Water from Gas-to-Liquids Industries
    Laurinonyte, Judita
    Meulepas, Roel J. W.
    van den Brink, Paula
    Temmink, Hardy
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2017, 228 (04)
  • [50] The removal of residual organic matter from biologically treated swine wastewater using membrane bioreactor process with powdered activated carbon
    Whang, GD
    Cho, YM
    Park, H
    Jang, JG
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 49 (5-6) : 451 - 457