Removal of 17-β estradiol from wastewater: comparison between a laboratory scale conventional activated sludge and a membrane bioreactor

被引:6
|
作者
Lopez-Fernandez, R. [1 ]
Tavares, F. V. F. [1 ]
Gomez, M. [1 ]
Irusta, R. [2 ]
Le-Clech, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] CARTIF Ctr Tecnol, Environm Div, Valladolid 47151, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, Higher Tech Coll Ind Engn, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Technol, E-47011 Valladolid, Spain
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Chem Engn & Ind Chem, UNESCO Ctr Membrane Sci & Technol, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
17-beta estradiol; Membrane bioreactor; Conventional activated sludge; Sludge retention time; Statistics; TREATMENT PLANTS; RETENTION TIME; ESTROGENS; DEGRADATION; MBR;
D O I
10.1080/19443994.2013.734583
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This work reports the performance of a laboratory scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a conventional activated sludge (CAS) treating a real industrial-municipal mixed wastewater, spiked with 17-beta estradiol (E2) in micrograms amounts. In order to compare the steady-state conditions of both systems, different sludge retention times (SRT) of 10 and 20 days were applied, while the other operational parameters were maintained unchanged. Results regarding the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrogen and E2 have been assessed with statistics analysis using the Mann-Whitney test. MBR outperforms the CAS treatment in terms of COD and nitrogen removal, and the increase in the SRT generally improves the performance of each system. However, E2 was almost completely eliminated in both systems and SRTs applied, leading to removal rates above 99%. Thus, this study shows that the biological elimination of E2 is not directly related to the nitrification rate, and other process or operational parameters should be of importance.
引用
收藏
页码:2336 / 2342
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Occurrence of EPS in activated sludge from a membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater
    Evenblij, H
    van der Graaf, JHJM
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 50 (12) : 293 - 300
  • [22] Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor
    Sahar, E.
    Ernst, M.
    Godehardt, M.
    Hein, A.
    Herr, J.
    Kazner, C.
    Melin, T.
    Cikurel, H.
    Aharoni, A.
    Messalem, R.
    Brenner, A.
    Jekel, M.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 63 (04) : 733 - 740
  • [23] Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater
    Munz, Giulio
    Gualtiero, Mori
    Salvadori, Laura
    Claudia, Barberio
    Lubello, Claudio
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (18) : 8559 - 8564
  • [24] Biodegradation of persistent polar pollutants in wastewater:: Comparison of an optimised lab-scale membrane bioreactor and activated sludge treatment
    Bernhard, Marco
    Mueller, Jutta
    Knepper, Thomas R.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2006, 40 (18) : 3419 - 3428
  • [25] ADSORPTION BEHAVIOR OF 17A-ETHINYLESTRADIOL ONTO ACTIVATED SLUDGE DERIVED FROM MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR
    Song, Hai-Liang
    Yang, Xiao-Li
    Chen, Tong-Qing
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2017, 26 (10): : 5789 - 5796
  • [26] Characterization and comparison of a membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated-sludge system in the treatment of wastewater containing high-molecular-weight compounds
    Çiçek, N
    Franco, JP
    Suidan, MT
    Urbain, V
    Manem, J
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1999, 71 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [27] Start-up of the Anammox process from the conventional activated sludge in a membrane bioreactor
    Wang, Tao
    Zhang, Hanmin
    Yang, Fenglin
    Liu, Sitong
    Fu, Zhimin
    Chen, Huihui
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (09) : 2501 - 2506
  • [28] Long-term comparison of trace organics removal performances between conventional and membrane activated sludge processes
    Zuehlke, S.
    Duennbier, U.
    Lesjean, B.
    Gnirss, R.
    Buisson, H.
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2006, 78 (13) : 2480 - 2486
  • [29] Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors
    De Wever, H
    Van Roy, S
    Dotremont, C
    Müller, J
    Knepper, T
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 50 (05) : 219 - 225
  • [30] COMPARISON OF TWO TREATMENTS FOR THE REMOVAL OF ORGANIC MICRO-POLLUTANTS: CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (CAS) FOLLOWED BY ULTRAFILTRATION (UF) VS. MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR)
    Sahar, E.
    Ernst, M.
    Godehardt, M.
    Hein, A.
    Herr, J.
    Kazner, C.
    Melin, T.
    Cikurel, H.
    Aharoni, A.
    Messalem, R.
    Brenner, A.
    Jekel, M.
    ADVANCED WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT: A ROAD TO SAFER SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, : 147 - 161