Removal of 17-β estradiol from wastewater: comparison between a laboratory scale conventional activated sludge and a membrane bioreactor

被引:6
作者
Lopez-Fernandez, R. [1 ]
Tavares, F. V. F. [1 ]
Gomez, M. [1 ]
Irusta, R. [2 ]
Le-Clech, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] CARTIF Ctr Tecnol, Environm Div, Valladolid 47151, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, Higher Tech Coll Ind Engn, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Technol, E-47011 Valladolid, Spain
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Chem Engn & Ind Chem, UNESCO Ctr Membrane Sci & Technol, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
17-beta estradiol; Membrane bioreactor; Conventional activated sludge; Sludge retention time; Statistics; TREATMENT PLANTS; RETENTION TIME; ESTROGENS; DEGRADATION; MBR;
D O I
10.1080/19443994.2013.734583
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This work reports the performance of a laboratory scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a conventional activated sludge (CAS) treating a real industrial-municipal mixed wastewater, spiked with 17-beta estradiol (E2) in micrograms amounts. In order to compare the steady-state conditions of both systems, different sludge retention times (SRT) of 10 and 20 days were applied, while the other operational parameters were maintained unchanged. Results regarding the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrogen and E2 have been assessed with statistics analysis using the Mann-Whitney test. MBR outperforms the CAS treatment in terms of COD and nitrogen removal, and the increase in the SRT generally improves the performance of each system. However, E2 was almost completely eliminated in both systems and SRTs applied, leading to removal rates above 99%. Thus, this study shows that the biological elimination of E2 is not directly related to the nitrification rate, and other process or operational parameters should be of importance.
引用
收藏
页码:2336 / 2342
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   The fate of selected micropollutants in a single-house MBR [J].
Abegglen, Christian ;
Joss, Adriano ;
McArdell, Christa S. ;
Fink, Guido ;
Schluesener, Michael P. ;
Ternes, Thomas A. ;
Siegrist, Hansruedi .
WATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (07) :2036-2046
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste- water
[3]   The solids retention time - a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants [J].
Clara, M ;
Kreuzinger, N ;
Strenn, B ;
Gans, O ;
Kroiss, H .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (01) :97-106
[4]   Biotransformation of estrogens in nitrifying activated sludge under aerobic and alternating anoxic/aerobic conditions [J].
Dytczak, M. A. ;
Londry, K. L. ;
Oleszkiewicz, J. A. .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2008, 80 (01) :47-52
[5]   Seasonal variability of the reduction in estrogenic activity at a municipal WWTP [J].
Fernandez, Marc P. ;
Buchanan, Ian D. ;
Ikonomou, Michael G. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2008, 42 (12) :3075-3081
[6]   Removal of estrogens in municipal wastewater treatment under aerobic and anaerobic conditions: Consequences for plant optimization [J].
Joss, A ;
Andersen, H ;
Ternes, T ;
Richle, PR ;
Siegrist, H .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (11) :3047-3055
[7]   Biological degradation of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater treatment:: Proposing a classification scheme [J].
Joss, Adriano ;
Zabczynski, Sebastian ;
Goebel, Anke ;
Hoffmann, Burkhard ;
Loeffler, Dirk ;
McArdell, Christa S. ;
Ternes, Thomas A. ;
Thomsen, Angela ;
Siegrist, Hansruedi .
WATER RESEARCH, 2006, 40 (08) :1686-1696
[8]   Ten persistent myths and the realities of membrane bioreactor technology for municipal applications [J].
Lesjean, B. ;
Tazi-Pain, A. ;
Thaure, D. ;
Moeslang, H. ;
Buisson, H. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 63 (01) :32-39
[9]   Endocrine disruptors in the environment - (IUPAC Technical Report) [J].
Lintelmann, J ;
Katayama, A ;
Kurihara, N ;
Shore, L ;
Wenzel, A .
PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2003, 75 (05) :631-681
[10]   Influencing parameters for the operation of an MBR with respect to the removal of persistent organic pollutants [J].
Lipp, P. ;
Kreissel, K. ;
Meuler, S. ;
Bischof, F. ;
Tiehm, A. .
DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2009, 6 (1-3) :102-107