Global Self-Optimizing Control for Uncertain Constrained Process Systems

被引:11
作者
Ye, Lingjian [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Yi [3 ]
Skogestad, Sigurd [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Ningbo Inst Technol, Ningbo 315100, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Chem Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[3] Cranfield Univ, Sch Water Energy & Environm, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
self-optimizing control; real-time optimization; constrained process; uncertain process; OPTIMAL MEASUREMENT COMBINATIONS; CONTROLLED VARIABLES; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.691
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Self-optimizing control is a promising control strategy to achieve real-time optimization (RTO) for uncertain process systems. Recently, a global self-optimizing control (gSOC) approach has been developed to extend the economic performance to be globally acceptable in the entire uncertain space spanned by disturbances and measurement noise. Nevertheless, the gSOC approach was derived based on the assumption of no change in active constraints, which limits the applicability of the approach. To address this deficiency, this paper proposes a new CV selection approach to handle active constraint changes. It ensures that all constraints are within their feasible regions when the selected CVs are maintained at constant setpoints for all expected uncertainties. In particular, constraints of interest are linearized at multiple operating conditions to get better estimates of their values and then incorporated into the optimization formulation when solving the globally self-optimizing CVs. The new CV selection approach is able to ensure an improved operational economic performance without potential constraint violations, as illustrated in an evaporator case study. (C) 2017, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4672 / 4677
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Null space method for selecting optimal measurement combinations as controlled variables [J].
Alstad, Vidar ;
Skogestad, Sigurd .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2007, 46 (03) :846-853
[2]   Optimal measurement combinations as controlled variables [J].
Alstad, Vidar ;
Skogestad, Sigurd ;
Hori, Eduardo S. .
JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2009, 19 (01) :138-148
[3]   Optimal output selection for control of batch processes [J].
Dahl-Olsen, Hakon ;
Narasimhan, Sridharakumar ;
Skogestad, Sigurd .
2008 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-12, 2008, :2870-2871
[4]   An industrial and academic perspective on plantwide control [J].
Downs, James J. ;
Skogestad, Sigurd .
ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL, 2011, 35 (01) :99-110
[5]   Selection of controlled variables and robust setpoints [J].
Govatsmark, MS ;
Skogestad, S .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2005, 44 (07) :2207-2217
[6]   Optimal feedback control of oil reservoir waterflooding processes [J].
Grema A.S. ;
Cao Y. .
International Journal of Automation and Computing, 2016, 13 (01) :73-80
[7]   Optimal selection of controlled variables [J].
Halvorsen, IJ ;
Skogestad, S ;
Morud, JC ;
Alstad, V .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2003, 42 (14) :3273-3284
[8]   Local self-optimizing control of constrained processes [J].
Hu, Wuhua ;
Umar, Lia Maisarah ;
Xiao, Gaoxi ;
Kariwala, Vinay .
JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2012, 22 (02) :488-493
[9]  
Hu Wuhua, 2012, IFAC Proc., V45, P774
[10]   Optimal controlled variables for polynomial systems [J].
Jaschke, Johannes ;
Skogestad, Sigurd .
JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2012, 22 (01) :167-179