Lexical fixedness and compositionality in L1 speakers' and L2 learners' intuitions about word combinations: Evidence from Italian

被引:3
作者
Fioravanti, Irene [1 ]
Senaldi, Marco Silvio Giuseppe [2 ]
Lenci, Alessandro [3 ]
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stranieri Siena, Piazza Carlo Rosselli 27, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[4] Te Herenga Waka Victoria Univ Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
[5] Ocean Univ China, Qingdao, Peoples R China
关键词
collocations; compositionality; free combinations; frequency; idioms; Italian; lexical fixedness; L2; learners; MODEL SELECTION; COLLOCATIONS; 2ND-LANGUAGE; FREQUENCY; ENGLISH; WEB;
D O I
10.1177/0267658320941560
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The present investigation focuses on first language (L1) and second language (L2) speakers' sensitivity to lexical fixedness and compositionality of Italian word combinations. Two studies explored language users' intuitions about three types of word combinations: free combinations, collocations, and idioms. In Study 1, Italian Verb+Noun combinations were embedded in sentential contexts, with control conditions created by substituting the verb with a synonym. L1 and L2 speakers rated sentence acceptability. In Study 2, the original verb was removed from sentences. Participants chose the verb from the list provided they felt was most acceptable. Computational measures were used to measure compositionality of word combinations. Mixed-effects modelling revealed that L1 and L2 speakers judged target word combinations differently in terms of lexical fixedness. In line with phraseological models, L1 speakers judged the use of a synonym as less acceptable in collocations than free combinations. On the contrary, L2 learners judged the use of a synonym as more acceptable in collocations than free combinations. However, all participants perceived idioms as least flexible of the three combination types. Results further showed an interesting effect of compositionality on the speakers' intuitions about the use of word combinations. Taken together, the findings provide new insights into how L1 and L2 speakers perceive word combinations that vary along the continua of lexical fixedness and compositionality.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 322
页数:32
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, Phraseology. Theory, analysis, and applications
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1983, Language and communication, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315836027
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1994, The encyclopedia of language and linguistics
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use, DOI [10.1075/lllt.9.09und, DOI 10.1075/LLLT.9.09UND]
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, DEP ENGLISH LUND WOR
  • [6] Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
    Baayen, R. H.
    Davidson, D. J.
    Bates, D. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) : 390 - 412
  • [7] Bahns J., 1993, SYSTEM, V21, P101, DOI 10.1016/0346-251X(93)90010-E
  • [8] The WaCky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora
    Baroni, Marco
    Bernardini, Silvia
    Ferraresi, Adriano
    Zanchetta, Eros
    [J]. LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, 2009, 43 (03) : 209 - 226
  • [9] Bates D., 2014, LME4 LINEAR MIXED EF, P1, DOI [DOI 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01]
  • [10] CATCHING ON TO IDIOMATIC EXPRESSIONS
    BOBROW, SA
    BELL, SM
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 1973, 1 (03) : 343 - 346