Effects of monopolar radiofrequency treatment over soft-tissue fillers in an animal model

被引:40
作者
England, LJ
Tan, MH
Shumaker, PR
Egbert, BM
Pittelko, K
Orentreich, D
Pope, K
机构
[1] Thermage Inc, Hayward, CA 94545 USA
[2] Orentreich Med Grp, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] USN, Med Ctr, San Diego, CA 92134 USA
[4] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA 94394 USA
关键词
collagen; laxity; non-ablative; RF; skin tightening; ThermaCool; Thermage;
D O I
10.1002/lsm.20253
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Monopolar radiofrequency (RF) treatment is used by physicians to tighten and contour the skin of their patients. In many cases, patients have received prior treatment with other aesthetic modalities such as soft-tissue augmentation or they may wish to receive these treatment modalities simultaneously. Together, soft-tissue augmentation and monopolar RF treatment have the potential to restore tissue volume and improve facial laxity. To date, no published studies have documented the effects of RF treatment directly over soft-tissue fillers. Study Design/Materials and Methods: We examined the tissue interactions of monopolar RF heating with five commonly injected fillers in a juvenile pig model. This is the first part of a two-part study. In this study, the interaction of monopolar RF and filler substances was examined over a period of 4 months. The five soft-tissue fillers examined were cross-linked human collagen (Cosmoplast (TM)), hyaluronic acid (Restylane (R)), calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse (TM)), polylactic acid (Sculptra (TM)), and liquid injectable silicone (Silikon (TM) 1000). Results: There was no apparent increase in the risk of local burns and no observable effect of RF treatment on filler persistence in the tissue. With monopolar RF treatment, an increase in fibroplasia and collagen deposition surrounding Restylane, Radiesse, and Sculptra was observed. When scored in a blinded fashion, the increase in collagen deposition was statistically significant for Radiesse. Conclusions: In this animal study, RF treatment had no observed adverse effect on filler collagen responses or persistence. Filler presence did not increase the risk of undesirable thermal effects with monopolar RF treatment. Further clinical studies are required to evaluate the effect of monopolar RF treatment over dermal fillers with respect to aesthetic outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 365
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*AAFPRS, 2004, AM AC FAC PLAST REC
[2]  
Abraham Manoj T, 2004, J Cosmet Laser Ther, V6, P136
[3]   Improvement of neck and cheek laxity with a nonablative radiofrequency device: A lifting experience [J].
Alster, TS ;
Tanzi, E .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2004, 30 (04) :503-507
[4]  
Bergeret-Galley Catherine, 2004, Aesthet Surg J, V24, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.asj.2004.01.006
[5]   SERIOUS LONG-TERM COMPLICATION FOLLOWING SILICONE INJECTION OF THE FACE [J].
BON, A ;
EICHMANN, A .
DERMATOLOGY, 1993, 187 (04) :286-287
[6]   BOVINE COLLAGEN IMPLANT - HISTOLOGIC CHRONOLOGY IN PIG DERMIS [J].
BURKE, KE ;
NAUGHTON, G ;
WALDO, E ;
CASSAI, N .
JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1983, 9 (11) :889-895
[7]  
BUSSO M, 2003, AESTHETIC TRENDS TEC, V2, P11
[8]   The silicone conundrum: A battle of anecdotes [J].
Duffy, DM .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2002, 28 (07) :590-594
[9]   Injectable hyaluronic acid gel for soft tissue augmentation - A clinical and histological study [J].
Duranti, F ;
Salti, G ;
Bovani, B ;
Calandra, M ;
Rosati, ML .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 1998, 24 (12) :1317-1325
[10]  
ENGLAND LJ, UNPUB DERMAL WOUND H