How to structure a social theory? A critical response to Anthony King's the structure of social theory

被引：3

作者：

Stueber, KR ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Coll Holy Cross, Worcester, MA 01610 USA

来源：

PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2006年 / 36卷 / 01期

关键词：

agency; hermeneutics; rules; social ontology; structure;

D O I：

10.1177/0048393105284229

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

This essay challenges King's argument for the claim that social relations have to be conceived of as primary and main ontological category for an adequate analysis of the social realm. The author shows that King's arguments do not succeed in fully replacing the categories of agency and structure that are pervasive in contemporary social theory. At most, King succeeds in delineating a neglected area of social theory, something that should be taken into account in addition to structure and agency.

引用

页码：95 / 104

页数：10

共 8 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1984, CONSTITUTIONS SOC

[2]

Archer M., 2003, STRUCTURE AGENCY INT, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139087315

[3]

Davidson D, 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE

[4]

DURKHEIM E, 1938, RULES SOCIOLOGICAL

[5] Norms, invariance, and explanatory relevance [J].

Henderson, D .

PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2005, 35 (03) :324-338

[6]

KING A, 2004, STRUCTURE SOCIAL THE, P268

[7]

STUEBER K, IN PRESS REDISCOVERI

[8] How to think about rules and rule following [J].

Stueber, KR .

PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2005, 35 (03) :307-323

← 1 →