Interpretative accounts of work capacity assessment policy for young adults with disabilities

被引:8
作者
Stafford, Lisa [1 ,2 ]
Marston, Greg [2 ]
Beatson, Amanda [3 ]
Chamorro-Koc, Marianella [4 ]
Drennan, Judy [3 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth & Social Work, Fac Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Social Sci Humanities & Social Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Business, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Creat Ind Fac, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Disability employment; work capacity assessment; welfare to work; young adults; service providers; disability; HUMAN-RIGHTS; EMPLOYMENT; WELFARE; PARTICIPATION; INDEPENDENCE; PERSPECTIVES; TRANSITIONS; PEOPLE; HEALTH; REFORM;
D O I
10.1080/09687599.2018.1561356
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Young adults with disabilities are a specific target of the welfare-to-work policy introduced by many OECD countries over the past decade. The implementation of these policies is a significant concern for service delivery organisations and advocates in Australia and internationally due to complex intersecting structural barriers that persist for many young adults with disabilities. A particular focus of this article is work capacity assessments. Drawing on socio-political theories and interpretive policy analysis, the 22 in-depth interviews with personnel from service delivery organisations and advocacy organisations reveal how the deemed capacity to work process is not only interpreted as flawed, but the current policy approach disables young adults, perpetuates stigma, and creates division between service users and service providers. The accounts reinforce the need to contest such assessments and instead turn towards a rights-based capability approach permitting young adults with disability self-determination over their education-to-employment pathway.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 903
页数:19
相关论文
共 63 条
[21]  
Gleeson Brendan., 1999, Geographies of Disability
[22]   Dis/ability and austerity: beyond work and slow death [J].
Goodley, Dan ;
Lawthom, Rebecca ;
Runswick-Cole, Katherine .
DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2014, 29 (06) :980-984
[23]  
Grover C, 2015, DISABLED PEOPLE, WORK AND WELFARE: IS EMPLOYMENT REALLY THE ANSWER?, P1, DOI 10.1332/policypress/9781447318323.001.0001
[24]   Alternative spaces of 'work' and inclusion for disabled people [J].
Hall, Edward ;
Wilton, Robert .
DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2011, 26 (07) :867-880
[25]   Parity of participation in liberal welfare states: human rights, neoliberalism, disability and employment [J].
Harris, Sarah Parker ;
Owen, Randall ;
Gould, Robert .
DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2012, 27 (06) :823-836
[26]   An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International classification of functioning, disability and health -: Some critical remarks [J].
Hemmingsson, H ;
Jonsson, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2005, 59 (05) :569-576
[27]   Shaping attitudes to disability employment with a national disability insurance scheme [J].
Hemphill, Elizabeth ;
Kulik, Carol T. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2016, 51 (03) :299-316
[28]   Employment status transitions among young adults, with and without disability [J].
Honey, Anne ;
Kariuki, Maina ;
Emerson, Eric ;
Llewellyn, Gwynnyth .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2014, 49 (02) :151-170
[29]   Demystifying disability:: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health [J].
Imrie, R .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2004, 26 (03) :287-305
[30]   Policy, citizenship and governance: the case of disability and employment policy in Australia [J].
Lantz, Sarah ;
Marston, Greg .
DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2012, 27 (06) :853-867