The incentives of large sophisticated creditors to run on a too big to fail financial institution

被引:7
作者
Carlson, Mark [1 ]
Rose, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Reserve Syst, Board Governors, Washington, DC USA
[2] Fed Reserve Bank Chicago, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
关键词
Bank runs; Deposit insurance; Deposit guarantee; Financial crisis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfs.2019.03.004
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper studies the incentives of large, sophisticated creditors to withdraw funds during a run on a systemically important financial institution-specifically the famous run on Continental Illinois in 1984. Surprisingly, we find that creditors with relatively liquid balance sheets initially withdrew more than other creditors. As time went on, institutions with relative large exposures were more likely to withdraw, despite government support which included a broad guarantee of all creditors. These findings have important implications for the design of facilities to resolve systemically important institutions in the future. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 104
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Bailey J., 1984, WALL STREET J, V15, P3
[2]  
Bailey J., 1984, WALL STREET J, V16, P1
[3]  
Bailey J., 1984, WALL STREET J, V11, P3
[4]  
Bennett R., 1984, NY TIMES
[5]  
Bernanke B., 2009, FED RES BANK KANS CI, V21
[6]  
Brown M., 2013, 201319 SWISS I BANK
[7]  
Calomiris Charles W., 2003, AM ECON REV, V87, P863
[8]  
Correa R., 2013, BOARD GOVERNORS FEDE, P1059
[9]   How Effective Were the Federal Reserve Emergency Liquidity Facilities? Evidence from the Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility [J].
Duygan-Bump, Burcu ;
Parkinson, Patrick ;
Rosengren, Eric ;
Suarez, Gustavo A. ;
Willen, Paul .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 68 (02) :715-737
[10]  
Estrella A., 2001, EC REV SVERIGES RIKS, P34