Probiotics for preventing gestational diabetes

被引:60
作者
Barrett, Helen L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nitert, Marloes Dekker [2 ,3 ]
Conwell, Louise S. [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Callaway, Leonie K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Herston, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Herston, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, UQ Ctr Clin Res, Herston, Qld, Australia
[4] Royal Childrens Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Sch Med, Queensland Childrens Med Res Inst, Herston, Qld, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Queensland Childrens Med Res Inst, Herston, Qld, Australia
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2014年 / 02期
关键词
GUT MICROBIOTA; PREGNANCY; OBESITY; MELLITUS; IMPACT; DIET; OVERWEIGHT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD009951.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with a range of adverse pregnancy outcomes for mother and infant. The prevention of GDM using lifestyle interventions has proven difficult. The gut microbiome (the composite of bacteria present in the intestines) influences host inflammatory pathways, glucose and lipid metabolism and, in other settings, alteration of the gut microbiome has been shown to impact on these host responses. Probiotics are one way of altering the gut microbiome but little is known about their use in influencing the metabolic environment of pregnancy. Objectives To assess the effects of probiotic supplementation when compared with other methods for the prevention of GDM. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2013) and reference lists of the articles of retrieved studies. Selection criteria Randomised and cluster-randomised trials comparing the use of probiotic supplementation with other methods for the prevention of the development of GDM. Cluster-randomised trials were eligible for inclusion but none were identified. Quasi-randomised and crossover design studies are not eligible for inclusion in this review. Studies presented only as abstracts with no subsequent full report of study results would also have been excluded. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included study. Data were checked for accuracy. Main results Eleven reports (relating to five possible trials) were found. We included one study (six trial reports) involving 256 women. Four other studies are ongoing. The included trial consisted of three treatment arms: probiotic with dietary intervention, placebo and dietary intervention, and dietary intervention alone; it was at a low risk of bias. The study reported primary outcomes of a reduction in the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (risk ratio (RR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.70), with no statistical difference in the rates of miscarriage/intrauterine fetal death (IUFD)/stillbirth/neonatal death (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.35 to 11.35). Secondary outcomes reported were a reduction in infant birthweight (mean difference (MD) -127.71 g, 95% CI -251.37 to -4.06) in the probiotic group and no clear evidence of increased risk of pretermdelivery (RR3.27, 95% CI 0.44 to 24.43), or caesarean section rate (RR1.23, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.32). The primary infant outcomes of rates of macrosomia and large-for-gestational age infants were not reported. The following secondary outcomes were not reported: maternal gestational weight gain, pre-eclampsia, and the long-term diagnosis of diabetes mellitus; infant body composition, shoulder dystocia, admission to neonatal intensive care, jaundice, hypoglycaemia and long-term rates of obesity and diabetes mellitus. Authors' conclusions One trial has shown a reduction in the rate of GDM when women are randomised to probiotics early in pregnancy but more uncertain evidence of any effect on miscarriage/IUFD/stillbirth/neonatal death. There are no data on macrosomia. At this time, there are insufficient studies to perform a quantitative meta-analysis. Further results are awaited from four ongoing studies.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Impact of maternal diet during pregnancy and breastfeeding on infant metabolic programming: a prospective randomized controlled study
    Aaltonen, J.
    Ojala, T.
    Laitinen, K.
    Poussa, T.
    Ozanne, S.
    Isolauri, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2011, 65 (01) : 10 - 19
  • [2] Evidence of infant blood pressure programming by maternal nutrition during pregnancy: A prospective randomized controlled intervention study
    Aaltonen, Jonna
    Ojala, Tina
    Laitinen, Kirsi
    Piirainen, Tarja Johanna
    Poussa, Tuija Annika
    Isolauri, Erika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2008, 152 (01) : 79 - 84
  • [3] Ahmed B, EFFECTS PROBIOTICS L
  • [4] Amer Diabet Assoc, 2012, DIABETES CARE, V35, pS64, DOI [10.2337/dc19-S002, 10.2337/dc12-S064, 10.2337/dc23-S002, 10.2337/dc09-S062, 10.2337/dc18-S002]
  • [5] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2005, Obstet Gynecol, V106, P671
  • [6] Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM on insulin sensitivity and the systemic inflammatory response in human subjects
    Andreasen, Anne Sofie
    Larsen, Nadja
    Pedersen-Skovsgaard, Theis
    Berg, Ronan M. G.
    Moller, Kirsten
    Svendsen, Kira Dynnes
    Jakobsen, Mogens
    Pedersen, Bente Klarlund
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2010, 104 (12) : 1831 - 1838
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2000, WHO TECHN REP SER
  • [8] [Anonymous], HLTH NUTR PROP PROB
  • [9] The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage
    Bäckhed, F
    Ding, H
    Wang, T
    Hooper, LV
    Koh, GY
    Nagy, A
    Semenkovich, CF
    Gordon, JI
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (44) : 15718 - 15723
  • [10] Bäckhed F, 2009, J PEDIATR GASTR NUTR, V48, pS56, DOI 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181a11851