Programmed intermittent boluses vs continuous epidural infusion in labor using an adrenaline containing solution: A randomized trial

被引:13
作者
Haidl, Felix [1 ,2 ]
Arne Rosseland, Leiv [2 ,3 ]
Rorvik, Anne-Marte [1 ]
Dahl, Vegard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Akershus Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Sykehusveien 25, N-1478 Lorenskog, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Emergencies & Crit Care, Dept Res & Dev, Nydalen, Norway
关键词
AUTOMATED MANDATORY BOLUSES; BASAL INFUSION; ANALGESIA; BUPIVACAINE; EPINEPHRINE; VOLUME; MAINTENANCE; DURATION; INTERVAL; FENTANYL;
D O I
10.1111/aas.13689
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Traditionally, epidural analgesia has been maintained using a continuous infusion (CEI) with the addition of patient-controlled boluses (PCEA). In recent years, programmed intermittent boluses (PIEB) has emerged as an alternative showing better efficacy in randomized studies. In this study, the aim was to test PIEB + PCEA vs CEI + PCEA using an epidural solution containing adrenaline. Methods In total, 150 nulliparous and multiparous laboring women were randomized to maintain epidural analgesia with either PIEB + PCEA (5 ml bolus every hour, 5 ml PCEA bolus lockout 20 minutes) or CEI + PCEA (5 ml/h, 5 ml PCEA bolus, lockout 20 minutes) using a solution of bupivacaine 1mg/ml, fentanyl 2 mcg/ml and adrenaline 2 mcg/ml. The primary outcome was total hourly consumption of the epidural solution. Secondary outcomes included hourly pain scores, motor block at 60 minutes and 10 cm cervical dilation, maternal satisfaction, and the need for anesthetist intervention and time to this intervention. Results We found no differences in hourly drug consumption between the groups (mean 9.0 ml/h (SD 3.7) (CEI group) vs. 8.1 ml/h (SD 2.0) (PIEB group),P = .08). We found a significant difference in number of successfully administered PCEA boluses (mean no. 3.9 (SD 4.1) (CEI group) vs. 1.9 (SD 2.0) (PIEB group),P < .001). We found no significant differences in pain score, motor block, maternal satisfaction and the need for anesthetist intervention. Conclusion In this study, we found no clinically relevant differences using PIEB + PCEA compared to CEI + PCEA when using an epidural solution containing adrenaline. Editorial Comment For labor epidural analgesia infusions, to optimize the analgesic effect, additional programmed intermittent boluses can be used as an alternative to patient-controlled boluses only. In this clinical trial, no differences in drug consumption or analgesic effect was observed when comparing these two different epidural bolus controls programs.
引用
收藏
页码:1505 / 1512
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Effects of Adrenaline on maternal and fetal fentanyl absorption in epidural analgesia: A randomized trial [J].
Haidl, F. ;
Rosseland, L. A. ;
Spigset, O. ;
Dahl, V. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 62 (09) :1267-1273
[12]   Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor: A Biased-Coin Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial to Determine the Optimum Interval Time Between Boluses of a Fixed Volume of 10 mL of Bupivacaine 0.0625% With Fentanyl 2 μg/mL [J].
Kanczuk, Marcelo Epsztein ;
Barrett, Nicholas Martin ;
Arzola, Cristian ;
Downey, Kristi ;
Ye, Xiang Y. ;
Carvalho, Jose C. A. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 124 (02) :537-541
[13]   A randomized comparison of automated intermittent mandatory boluses with a basal infusion in combination with patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery [J].
Leo, S. ;
Ocampo, C. E. ;
Lim, Y. ;
Sia, A. T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 19 (04) :357-364
[14]   Addition of epinephrine to epidural ropivacaine during labour - effects on onset and duration of action, efficacy, and systemic absorption of ropivacaine [J].
Leonard, SA ;
Flynn, R ;
Kelleher, N ;
Shorten, GD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2002, 11 (03) :180-184
[15]   Comparison of automated intermittent low volume bolus with continuous infusion for labour epidural analgesia [J].
Lim, Y. ;
Chakravarty, S. ;
Ocampo, C. E. ;
Sia, A. T. .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2010, 38 (05) :894-899
[16]   Advantages and disadvantages of adrenaline in regional anaesthesia [J].
Niemi, Geir .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (02) :229-245
[17]   A randomised comparison of variable-frequency automated mandatory boluses with a basal infusion for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour and delivery [J].
Sia, A. T. ;
Leo, S. ;
Ocampo, C. E. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 (03) :267-275
[18]   A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor [J].
Sia, Alex T. ;
Lim, Yvonne ;
Ocampo, Cecilia .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (03) :673-678
[19]   Automatedmandatory bolus versus basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labour [J].
Sng, Ban Leong ;
Zeng, Yanzhi ;
de Souza, Nurun Nisa A. ;
Leong, Wan Ling ;
Oh, Ting Ting ;
Siddiqui, Fahad Javaid ;
Assam, Pryseley N. ;
Han, Nian-Lin R. ;
Chan, Edwin S. Y. ;
Sia, Alex T. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (05)
[20]   A retrospective comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for maintenance of labor analgesia [J].
Tien, Michael ;
Allen, Terrence K. ;
Mauritz, Amy ;
Habib, Ashraf S. .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2016, 32 (08) :1435-1440