The Future of Global Great Power Competition after the Coronavirus

被引:6
作者
Duran, Burhanettin [1 ]
机构
[1] Ibn Haldun Univ, Basaksehir, Turkey
关键词
COVID-19; Great Power Competition; International Order; United States; China;
D O I
10.25253/99.2020222.06
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the domestic and foreign policy agendas of all countries have been turned upside down. The pandemic has brought new problems and competition areas to states and to the international system. While the pandemic politically calls to mind the post-World War II era, it can also be compared with the 2008 crisis due to its economic effects such as unemployment and the disruption of global supply chains. A debate immediately began for a new international system; however, it seems that the current international system will be affected, but will not experience a radical change. That is, a new international order is not expected, while disorder is most likely in the post-pandemic period. In an atmosphere of global instability where debates on the U.S.-led international system have been worn for a while, in the post-pandemic period states will invest in self-sufficiency and redefine their strategic areas, especially in health security. The decline of U.S. leadership, the challenging policies of China, the effects of Chinese policies on the U.S.-China relations and the EU's deepening crisis are going to be the main discussion topics that will determine the future of the international system.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 92
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   The global economic cost of coronavirus pandemic: current and future implications [J].
Ajmal, Mian M. ;
Khan, Mehmood ;
Shad, Muhammad Kashif .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY-AN ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL, 2021, 24 (03) :290-305
[22]   Trade, Power, and Welfare: An International Economic Political Analysis of Great Power Competition [J].
Zhang, Yuyan ;
Xia, Guangtao .
SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CHINA, 2024, 45 (03) :57-75
[23]   After Abdication: America Debates the Future of Global Leadership [J].
Kristensen P.M. .
Chinese Political Science Review, 2017, 2 (4) :550-566
[24]   Navigating great power competition: a neoclassical realist view of hedging [J].
Marston, Hunter S. .
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC, 2024, 24 (01) :29-63
[25]   Why Biden should abandon the great power competition narrative [J].
Squassoni, Sharon .
BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 2021, 77 (01) :3-4
[26]   Understanding the Mechanisms of International Influence in an Era of Great Power Competition [J].
Meierding, Emily ;
Sigman, Rachel .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL SECURITY STUDIES, 2021, 6 (04)
[27]   Great Power Competition and the Logic of Strategic Choice in UN Conflict Management: An Evolutionary Game Model [J].
Hu, Bangjie ;
Shen, Wen .
INTERNATIONAL PEACEKEEPING, 2025, 32 (03) :517-559
[28]   Russia's Narratives of Global Order: Great Power Legacies in a Polycentric World [J].
Miskimmon, Alister ;
O'Loughlin, Ben .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2017, 5 (03) :111-120
[29]   Globalization, deglobalization and Great Power politics [J].
Ripsman, Norrin M. .
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2021, 97 (05) :1317-+
[30]   Great Power Competition and Pakistan: A Power Transition Theory Perspective 1947-1991 [J].
Gul, Azeem ;
Shad, Muhammad Riaz ;
Imran, Sumeera .
CHINESE POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2024, 9 (03) :418-439