Using dual response surfaces to reduce variability in launch vehicle design: A case study

被引:24
作者
Yeniay, O
Unal, R [1 ]
Lepsch, RA
机构
[1] Old Dominion Univ, Engn Management & Syst Engn Dept, Norfolk, VA 23693 USA
[2] Univ Hacettepe, Dept Stat, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[3] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Vehicle Anal Branch, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
uncertainty; response surface methods; D-Optimal designs; optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2005.02.007
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Space transportation system conceptual design is a multi disciplinary process containing considerable element of risk. Uncertainties from one engineering discipline may propagate to another through linking parameters and the final system output may have an accumulation of risk. This may lead to significant deviations from expected performance. An estimate of variability or design risk therefore becomes essential for a robust design. This study utilizes the dual response surface approach to quantify variability in critical performance characteristics during conceptual design phase of a launch vehicle. Using design of experiments methods and disciplinary design analysis codes, dual response surfaces are constructed for the mean and standard deviation to quantify variability in vehicle weight and sizing analysis. Next, an optimum solution is sought to minimize variability subject to a constraint on mean weight. In this application, the dual response surface approach lead to quantifying and minimizing variability without much increase in design effort. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 412
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]  
Khui A., 1987, RESPONSE SURFACES DE
[12]   Optimization of GMA welding process using the dual response approach [J].
Kim, D ;
Rhee, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2003, 41 (18) :4505-4515
[13]  
Kim KJ, 1998, J QUAL TECHNOL, V30, P1
[14]   DUAL-FUEL PROPULSION IN SINGLE-STAGE ADVANCED MANNED LAUNCH SYSTEM VEHICLE [J].
LEPSCH, RA ;
STANLEY, DO ;
UNAL, R .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1995, 32 (03) :417-425
[15]   DUAL RESPONSE-SURFACE OPTIMIZATION [J].
LIN, DKJ ;
TU, WZ .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 27 (01) :34-39
[16]   Robust design of a spindle motor: a case study [J].
Menon, R ;
Tong, LH ;
Zhijie, L ;
Ibrahim, Y .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2002, 75 (03) :313-319
[17]   ALGORITHM FOR CONSTRUCTION OF D-OPTIMAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS [J].
MITCHELL, TJ .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1974, 16 (02) :203-210
[18]  
Montgomery D. C., 1991, DESIGN ANAL EXPT
[19]  
Myers R.H., 1971, RESPONSE SURFACE MET, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.044
[20]  
Phadke S. M., 1989, QUALITY ENG USING RO