Analgesic Efficacy and Tolerability of Intravenous Morphine Versus Combined Intravenous Morphine and Oxycodone in a 2-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Pilot Trial of Patients With Moderate to Severe Pain After Total Hip Replacement

被引:11
|
作者
Joppich, Robin [2 ]
Richards, Patricia [1 ]
Kelen, Robin [1 ]
Stern, Warren [1 ]
Zarghooni, Kourosh [4 ]
Otto, Christina [4 ]
Boehmer, Andreas [2 ]
Petzke, Frank [5 ]
Treptau, Tilman [6 ]
Lefering, Rolf [6 ]
Baethis, Holger [3 ]
Neugebauer, Edmund [6 ]
机构
[1] QRxPharma Inc, Bedminster, NJ 07921 USA
[2] Univ Witten Herdecke, Dept Anaesthesia Operat Intens Care, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Witten Herdecke, Dept Trauma Orthopaed Surg, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, ZKS, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Cologne, Dept Anaesthesiol & Postoperat Intens Care, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[6] Univ Witten Herdecke, Inst Res Operat Med, Cologne, Germany
关键词
analgesia; intravenous; morphine; oxycodone; postoperative pain; tolerability; ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; MANAGEMENT; FENTANYL; SAFETY; HYDROCHLORIDE; SYNERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.023
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Results from studies with a combination of oral morphine and oxycodone in postsurgical patients demonstrate significant analgesia and a tolerability profile comparable to other pain medications at morphine-equivalent doses. However, an intravenous (IV) combination has not previously been studied. Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of IV morphine versus a combination of IV morphine and IV oxycodone in a 1:1 ratio. Methods: This was a 2-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled pilot trial of 40 patients who had undergone total hip replacement. After surgery, when pain levels reached >= 4 (on the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale), patients were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups. In part 1 of the study, patients were dosed every 5 minutes for the first 65 minutes (up to 13 doses) with study drug, provided that vital signs criteria were met. After an initial loading dose of either morphine 1.5 mg coadministered with oxycodone 1.5 mg or morphine 3 mg alone, patients received IV morphine 1.5 mg or IV morphine 0.75 mg/IV oxycodone 0.75 mg every 5 minutes. If patients achieved a pain score of 2 or experienced intolerable adverse events to drug when stable, they were permitted to enter part 2. In part 2, patients received blinded study medication (IV morphine plus IV oxycodone [0.5 mg/0.5 mg] or 1 mg IV morphine alone) via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 47 hours. Results: At baseline, treatment groups were comparable except for a higher proportion of females in the IV morphine group. Baseline pain intensity averaged 7 on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale of 0 to 10. One patient in the morphine group and 2 patients in the morphine/oxycodone group discontinued the study. The sum of the pain intensity differences from baseline to 65 minutes during the dose-titration phase was 1.8 for morphine alone versus 2.7 for morphine/oxycodone (P = 0.12); these values occurred at the same median number of doses (12) for each group. In part 2 (PCA dosing) of the study, similar levels of analgesia were achieved. During the study, 24% of the IV morphine/oxycodone group and 37% of the IV morphine group experienced nausea, and 10% of the IV morphine/oxycodone group and 16% of the IV morphine group had emesis. Two patients in the IV morphine/oxycodone group and 4 in the IV morphine alone group experienced oxygen desaturation. Conclusions: The combination of IV morphine and oxycodone provided pain relief with an acceptable tolerability profile in these patients experiencing moderate to severe postoperative pain. However, as an explorative pilot study, the power was not adequate to demonstrate statistical significance for differences between IV morphine/oxycodone and IV morphine alone. European Clinical Trials Data Base registration code: EudraCT-No. 2008-008527-14. (Clin Ther. 2012;34:1751-1760) (C) 2012 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1751 / 1760
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analgesic Efficacy of Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intranasal Fentanyl for Moderate to Severe Pain in Children A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study
    Quinn, Kellie
    Kriss, Sabina
    Drapkin, Jefferson
    Likourezos, Antonios
    Pushkar, Illya
    Brady, Jason
    Yasavolian, Matthew
    Chitnis, Salil S.
    Motov, Sergey
    Fromm, Christian
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2021, 37 (05) : 250 - 254
  • [32] Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Sufentanil versus Fentanyl in Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Prospective Study
    Oh, Seok Kyeong
    Lee, Il Ok
    Lim, Byung Gun
    Jeong, Hyerim
    Kim, Young Sung
    Ji, Sul Gi
    Park, Jong Sun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 16 (11): : 1439 - 1446
  • [33] A comparative study of the analgesic effects of intravenous ketorolac, paracetamol, and morphine in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A double-blind, active-controlled, randomized clinical trial
    Dastan, Farzaneh
    Langari, Zahra
    Salamzadeh, Jamshid
    Khalili, Ali
    Aqajani, Sahar
    Jahangirifard, Alireza
    ANNALS OF CARDIAC ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 23 (02) : 177 - 182
  • [34] The analgesic efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion after laparoscopic fundoplication: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Dale, Gregory J.
    Phillips, Stephanie
    Falk, Gregory L.
    LOCAL AND REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 9 : 87 - 93
  • [35] Periosteal Nerve Block Vs. Intravenous Morphine in Pain Relief of Distal Radius and Ulna Fracture; a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Ashtari, Shadi
    Hasanzadeh, Alireza
    Bahmani, Alireza
    Abdolrazaghnejad, Ali
    ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [36] Palonosetron versus ondansetron for prevention of nausea and vomiting after total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Campos, Guilherme Oliveira
    Martins, Marcelo de Jesus
    Jesus, Gabriel Nascimento
    Rios de Oliveira, Paulo Roberto
    Lessa, Caio Nogueira
    Macedo Fernandes de Oliveira Junior, Joao Carlos
    Santana de Castro Alves, Lucas Jorge
    Alves, Rodrigo Leal
    Pinheiro Modolo, Norma Sueli
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [37] Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Geertrui Dewinter
    Marc Van de Velde
    Steffen Fieuws
    Andre D’Hoore
    Steffen Rex
    Trials, 15
  • [38] Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Dewinter, Geertrui
    Van de Velde, Marc
    Fieuws, Steffen
    D'Hoore, Andre
    Rex, Steffen
    TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [39] INTRAVENOUS SUFENTANIL AND MORPHINE FOR POST-CARDIAC SURGERY PAIN RELIEF USING PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA (PCA) DEVICE: A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL
    Alavi, Seyed Mostafa
    Kish, Rasoul Ferasat
    Farsad, Fariborz
    Imani, Farnad
    Sheikhvatan, Mehrdad
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 26 (01) : 137 - 141
  • [40] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of IV morphine-6-glucuronide for postoperative pain relief after knee replacement surgery
    Romberg, Raymonda
    van Dorp, Eveline
    Hollander, Justus
    Kruit, Michel
    Binning, Alexander
    Smith, Terry
    Dahan, Albert
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2007, 23 (03) : 197 - 203