Analgesic Efficacy and Tolerability of Intravenous Morphine Versus Combined Intravenous Morphine and Oxycodone in a 2-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Pilot Trial of Patients With Moderate to Severe Pain After Total Hip Replacement

被引:11
|
作者
Joppich, Robin [2 ]
Richards, Patricia [1 ]
Kelen, Robin [1 ]
Stern, Warren [1 ]
Zarghooni, Kourosh [4 ]
Otto, Christina [4 ]
Boehmer, Andreas [2 ]
Petzke, Frank [5 ]
Treptau, Tilman [6 ]
Lefering, Rolf [6 ]
Baethis, Holger [3 ]
Neugebauer, Edmund [6 ]
机构
[1] QRxPharma Inc, Bedminster, NJ 07921 USA
[2] Univ Witten Herdecke, Dept Anaesthesia Operat Intens Care, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Witten Herdecke, Dept Trauma Orthopaed Surg, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, ZKS, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Cologne, Dept Anaesthesiol & Postoperat Intens Care, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[6] Univ Witten Herdecke, Inst Res Operat Med, Cologne, Germany
关键词
analgesia; intravenous; morphine; oxycodone; postoperative pain; tolerability; ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; MANAGEMENT; FENTANYL; SAFETY; HYDROCHLORIDE; SYNERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.023
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Results from studies with a combination of oral morphine and oxycodone in postsurgical patients demonstrate significant analgesia and a tolerability profile comparable to other pain medications at morphine-equivalent doses. However, an intravenous (IV) combination has not previously been studied. Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of IV morphine versus a combination of IV morphine and IV oxycodone in a 1:1 ratio. Methods: This was a 2-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled pilot trial of 40 patients who had undergone total hip replacement. After surgery, when pain levels reached >= 4 (on the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale), patients were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups. In part 1 of the study, patients were dosed every 5 minutes for the first 65 minutes (up to 13 doses) with study drug, provided that vital signs criteria were met. After an initial loading dose of either morphine 1.5 mg coadministered with oxycodone 1.5 mg or morphine 3 mg alone, patients received IV morphine 1.5 mg or IV morphine 0.75 mg/IV oxycodone 0.75 mg every 5 minutes. If patients achieved a pain score of 2 or experienced intolerable adverse events to drug when stable, they were permitted to enter part 2. In part 2, patients received blinded study medication (IV morphine plus IV oxycodone [0.5 mg/0.5 mg] or 1 mg IV morphine alone) via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 47 hours. Results: At baseline, treatment groups were comparable except for a higher proportion of females in the IV morphine group. Baseline pain intensity averaged 7 on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale of 0 to 10. One patient in the morphine group and 2 patients in the morphine/oxycodone group discontinued the study. The sum of the pain intensity differences from baseline to 65 minutes during the dose-titration phase was 1.8 for morphine alone versus 2.7 for morphine/oxycodone (P = 0.12); these values occurred at the same median number of doses (12) for each group. In part 2 (PCA dosing) of the study, similar levels of analgesia were achieved. During the study, 24% of the IV morphine/oxycodone group and 37% of the IV morphine group experienced nausea, and 10% of the IV morphine/oxycodone group and 16% of the IV morphine group had emesis. Two patients in the IV morphine/oxycodone group and 4 in the IV morphine alone group experienced oxygen desaturation. Conclusions: The combination of IV morphine and oxycodone provided pain relief with an acceptable tolerability profile in these patients experiencing moderate to severe postoperative pain. However, as an explorative pilot study, the power was not adequate to demonstrate statistical significance for differences between IV morphine/oxycodone and IV morphine alone. European Clinical Trials Data Base registration code: EudraCT-No. 2008-008527-14. (Clin Ther. 2012;34:1751-1760) (C) 2012 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1751 / 1760
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analgesic effect of paracetamol combined with lowdose morphine versus morphine alone on patients with biliary colic: a double blind, randomized controlled trial
    Mohammad Reza Farnia
    Rasoul Babaei
    Farzaneh Shirani
    Mehdi Momeni
    Majid Hajimaghsoudi
    Elnaz Vahidi
    Morteza Saeedi
    World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2016, (01) : 25 - 29
  • [22] Comparative Analysis of Nebulized Versus Intravenous Fentanyl for Pain Control After Tonsillectomy: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Pantabtim, Chanitda
    Chumpathong, Saowapark
    Vichitvejpaisal, Phongthara
    Limsettho, Wilawan
    Mangmeesri, Peerachatra
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 133 (09) : 776 - 782
  • [23] Efficacy and Safety Profile of a Single Dose of Hydromorphone Compared with Morphine in Older Adults with Acute, Severe Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Chang, Andrew K.
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Baccelieri, Angelo
    Gallagher, E. John
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2009, 7 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [24] Patient Controlled Subcutaneous Analgesia of Hydromorphone Versus Morphine to Treat Moderate and Severe Cancer Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial
    Zeng, Xianzheng
    Zhu, Jiang
    Li, Jun
    Chen, Chan
    Sang, Ling
    Liu, Maotong
    Song, Li
    Liu, Hui
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2024, 67 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [25] Low-dose intravenous ketamine versus intravenous ketorolac in pain control in patients with acute renal colic in an emergency setting: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Sotoodehnia, Mehran
    Farmahini-Farahani, Mozhgan
    Safaie, Arash
    Rasooli, Fatemeh
    Baratloo, Alireza
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 32 (02) : 97 - 104
  • [26] Effects of 2 Different Doses of Pregabalin on Morphine Consumption and Pain After Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Yucel, Aytac
    Ozturk, Erdogan
    Aydogan, M. Said
    Durmus, Mahmut
    Colak, Cemil
    Ersoy, M. Ozcan
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2011, 72 (04): : 173 - 183
  • [27] Abuse potential and analgesic efficacy of intravenous hydromorphone bolus administration among hospitalized patients with cancer pain: A double-blind, double dummy, randomized crossover trial
    Arthur, Joseph A.
    Reddy, Akhila
    Popat, Uday
    Halm, Josiah
    Vaughan-Adams, Nicole
    Myers, Alan
    Yang, Peiying
    De Moraes, Aline Rozman
    Laureano, Raul
    Lopez-Quinones, Irma
    Urbauer, Diana
    Hui, David
    Bruera, Eduardo
    CANCER, 2025, 131 (03)
  • [28] Randomized Double-Blind Trial Comparing Efficacy of Intravenous Nalbuphine vs Intrathecal Nalbuphine for Prevention of Intrathecal Morphine Induced Pruritus in Orthopaedic Surgeries
    Kurhekar, Pranjali
    Krishna, Shesha Dhiviya J.
    SRI LANKAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 31 (02): : 128 - +
  • [29] Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Meloxicam in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Pain After Open Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial
    Rechberger, Tomasz
    Mack, Randall J.
    McCallum, Stewart W.
    Du, Wei
    Freyer, Alex
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 128 (06) : 1309 - 1318
  • [30] A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial to Assess the Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Preemptive Caudal Morphine as an Adjunct to Bupivacaine for Lumbosacral Spine Surgeries in Adults
    Malviya, Amit K.
    Sawhney, Chhavi
    Baidya, Dalim K.
    Bhattacharjee, Sulagna
    Kumar, Ajeet
    Farooque, Kamran
    Arora, Mahesh
    Chhabra, Anjolie
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (08)