Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis

被引:1347
作者
Leucht, Stefan [1 ]
Corves, Caroline [1 ,2 ]
Arbter, Dieter [1 ]
Engel, Rolf R. [2 ]
Li, Chunbo [3 ,4 ]
Davis, John M. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Klin & Poliklin Psychiat & Psychotherapie, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Munich, Germany
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Mental Hlth Ctr, Dept Biol Psychiat, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Tongji Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Illinois, Inst Psychiat, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Maryland Psychiat Res Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; HALOPERIDOL; RISPERIDONE; QUETIAPINE; EFFICACY; OLANZAPINE; CLOZAPINE; ARIPIPRAZOLE;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61764-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Because of the debate about whether second-generation antipsychotic drugs are better than first-generation antipsychotic drugs, we did a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to compare the effects of these two types of drugs in patients with schizophrenia. Methods We compared nine second-generation antipsychotic drugs with first-generation drugs for overall efficacy (main outcome), positive, negative and depressive symptoms, relapse, quality of life, extrapyramidal side-effects, weight gain, and sedation. Findings We included 150 double-blind, mostly short-term, studies, with 21533 participants. We excluded open studies because they systematically favoured second-generation drugs. Four of these drugs were better than first-generation antipsychotic drugs for overall efficacy, with small to medium effect sizes (amisulpride -0.31 [95% Cl -0.44 to -0.19, p<0.0001], clozapine -0.52 [-0.75 to -0.29, p<0.0001], olanzapine -0.28 [-0.38 to -0.18, p<0.0001], and risperidone -0.13 [-0.22 to -0.05, p=0.002]). The other second-generation drugs were not more efficacious than the first-generation drugs, even for negative symptoms. Therefore efficacy on negative symptoms cannot be a core component of atypicality. Second-generation antipsychotic drugs induced fewer extrapyramidal side-effects than did haloperidol (even at low doses). Only a few have been shown to induce fewer extrapyramidal side-effects than low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs. With the exception of aripiprazole and ziprasidone, second-generation antipsychotic drugs induced more weight gain, in various degrees, than did haloperidol but not than low-potency first-generation drugs. The second-generation drugs also differed in their sedating properties. We did not note any consistent effects of moderator variables, such as industry sponsorship, comparator dose, or prophylactic antiparkinsonian medication. Interpretation Second-generation antipsychotic drugs differ in many properties and are not a homogeneous class. This meta-analysis provides data for individualised treatment based on efficacy, side-effects, and cost. Funding National Institute of Mental Health.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 41
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Allison DB, 1999, AM J PSYCHIAT, V156, P1686
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1990, Br J Psychiatry, V156, P412
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1969, DIAGNOSIS DRUG TREAT
  • [4] [Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [5] [Anonymous], ARZNEIMITTELVERORDNU
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2002, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2005, COCHRANE LIB
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  • [9] [Anonymous], 20639 NDA FOOD DRUG
  • [10] [Anonymous], COCHRANE SCHIZOPHREN