Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose by adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique level for chest CT examination

被引:5
作者
Hong, Sun Suk [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jong-Woong [3 ]
Seo, Jeong Beom [4 ]
Jung, Jae-Eun [5 ]
Choi, Jiwon [6 ]
Kweon, Dae Cheol [7 ]
机构
[1] Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Eulji Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, Songnam 461713, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gang Dong, Dept Radiol, Seoul 134727, South Korea
[4] Konkuk Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, Seoul 143729, South Korea
[5] Daegu Hlth Coll, Dept Radiol Technol, Taegu 702722, South Korea
[6] Jeonju Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, Jeonju 560759, South Korea
[7] Shinheung Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, Uijongbu 480701, South Korea
关键词
REDUCTION STRATEGY; OPTIMIZATION; TOMOGRAPHY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1093/rpd/nct127
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research is to determine the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) level that enables optimal image quality and dose reduction in the chest computed tomography (CT) protocol with ASIR. A chest phantom with 050 ASIR levels was scanned and then noise power spectrum (NPS), signal and noise and the degree of distortion of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) were measured. In addition, the objectivity of the experiment was measured using the American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom. Moreover, on a qualitative basis, five lesions resolution, latitude and distortion degree of chest phantom and their compiled statistics were evaluated. The NPS value decreased as the frequency increased. The lowest noise and deviation were at the 20 ASIR level, mean 126.1522.21. As a result of the degree of distortion, signal-to-noise ratio and PSNR at 20 ASIR level were at the highest value as 31.0 and 41.52. However, maximum absolute error and RMSE showed the lowest deviation value as 11.2 and 16. In the ACR phantom study, all ASIR levels were within acceptable allowance of guidelines. The 20 ASIR level performed best in qualitative evaluation at five lesions of chest phantom as resolution score 4.3, latitude 3.47 and the degree of distortion 4.25. The 20 ASIR level was proved to be the best in all experiments, noise, distortion evaluation using ImageJ and qualitative evaluation of five lesions of a chest phantom. Therefore, optimal images as well as reduce radiation dose would be acquired when 20 ASIR level in thoracic CT is applied.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 171
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee, 2008, 96 AAPM TASK GROUP 2
  • [2] OVERVIEW OF COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY WITH EMPHASIS ON FUTURE-DEVELOPMENTS
    BATES, RHT
    GARDEN, KL
    PETERS, TM
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1983, 71 (03) : 356 - 372
  • [3] Diederich S, 2000, CANCER, V89, P2483, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2483::AID-CNCR27>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-1
  • [5] Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at CT: Feasibility Study
    Hara, Amy K.
    Paden, Robert G.
    Silva, Alvin C.
    Kujak, Jennifer L.
    Lawder, Holly J.
    Pavlicek, William
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (03) : 764 - 771
  • [6] Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization
    Kalra, MK
    Maher, MM
    Toth, TL
    Hamberg, LM
    Blake, MA
    Shephard, JA
    Saini, S
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) : 619 - 628
  • [7] Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: From basics to practice
    Lee, Chang Hyun
    Goo, Jin Mo
    Lee, Hyun Ju
    Ye, Sung-Joon
    Park, Chang Min
    Chun, Eun Ju
    Im, Jung-Gi
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (05) : 1451 - 1459
  • [8] Diagnostic CT scans: Assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks
    Lee, CI
    Haims, AH
    Monico, EP
    Brink, JA
    Forman, HP
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) : 393 - 398
  • [9] The phantom portion of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Computed Tomography (CT) accreditation program: Practical tips, artifact examples, and pitfalls to avoid
    McCollough, CH
    Bruesewitz, MR
    McNitt-Gray, MF
    Bush, K
    Ruckdeschel, T
    Payne, JT
    Brink, JA
    Zeman, RK
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (09) : 2423 - 2442
  • [10] CT dose reduction and dose management tools: Overview of available options
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    Bruesewitz, Michael R.
    Kofler, James M., Jr.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2006, 26 (02) : 503 - U14