A desirability function method for optimizing mean and variability of multiple responses using a posterior preference articulation approach

被引:81
作者
Lee, Dong-Hee [1 ]
Jeong, In-Jun [2 ]
Kim, Kwang-Jae [3 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Coll Interdisciplinary Ind Studies, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Daegu Univ, Dept Business Adm, Gyongsan, Gyeongsangbuk D, South Korea
[3] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind & Management Engn, Pohang, Gyeongsangbuk D, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
desirability function; multi-response optimization; posterior preference articulation approach; SURFACE OPTIMIZATION; MULTIRESPONSE OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1002/qre.2258
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A desirability function approach has been widely used in multi-response optimization due to its simplicity. Most of the existing desirability function-based methods assume that the variability of the response variables is stable; thus, they focus mainly on the optimization of the mean of multiple responses. However, this stable variability assumption often does not apply in practical situations; thus, the quality of the product or process can be severely degraded due to the high variability of multiple responses. In this regard, we propose a new desirability function method to simultaneously optimize both the mean and variability of multiple responses. In particular, the proposed method uses a posterior preference articulation approach, which has an advantage in investigating tradeoffs between the mean and variability of multiple responses. It is expected that process engineers can use this method to better understand the tradeoffs, thereby obtaining a satisfactory compromise solution.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 376
页数:17
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Quality loss functions for optimization across multiple response surfaces [J].
Ames, AE ;
Mattucci, N ;
MacDonald, S ;
Szonyi, G ;
Hawkins, DM .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 29 (03) :339-346
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1976, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O
[4]  
CARROLL RJ, 1998, TRANSFORMATION WEIGH
[5]   Incorporating response variability and estimation uncertainty into Pareto front optimization [J].
Chapman, Jessica L. ;
Lu, Lu ;
Anderson-Cook, Christine M. .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 76 :253-267
[6]   Process Optimization for Multiple Responses Utilizing the Pareto Front Approach [J].
Chapman, Jessica L. ;
Lu, Lu ;
Anderson-Cook, Christine M. .
QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2014, 26 (03) :253-268
[7]   Dual response optimization via direct function minimization [J].
Copeland, KAF ;
Nelson, PR .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 28 (03) :331-336
[8]  
DERRINGER G, 1980, J QUAL TECHNOL, V12, P214, DOI 10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968
[9]  
DERRINGER GC, 1994, QUAL PROG, V27, P51
[10]  
HAIMES YY, 1971, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, VSMC1, P296