The Collective Power of We: Breaking Barriers in Community Engagement through Dialogue

被引:0
作者
De Santis, Jessica L. [1 ]
O'Connor, Sarah P. [1 ]
Pritchard, Kathleen [2 ]
Franco, Zeno E. [3 ]
Ahmed, Syed M. [3 ]
Nelson, David A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Off Community Engagement, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Joseph J Zilber Sch Publ Hlth, Milwaukee, WI USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Family & Community Med, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
Community engagement; Nominal group technique; Community based participatory research; NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; HEALTH; EDUCATION; STAKEHOLDERS; EXPERIENCE; OUTCOMES; CBPR;
D O I
10.1007/s10755-018-9454-y
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
How we engage the community within our institutions, from higher education to social services, requires consistent reconceptualization. Many fields benefit from engaging the community; yet research around practical methods for engagement is limited. This study describes the process of using nominal group technique as a practical method for both community and academic members to discuss Community Based Participatory Research. Participants included faculty, staff, students, and community member stakeholders of a medical institution during a community engagement themed conference. The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of using the nominal group technique for community and academic members to discuss the principles of Community Based Participatory Research. Through this discussion a significant change in the research paradigm was addressed by focusing on the importance of dialogue in order to have an impact on health disparities. This study serves to illustrate a method for bringing community and academic members together around discussion of a complex topic, while simultaneously identifying general perceptions around Community Based Participatory Research.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 160
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Reaching out to the underserved: A successful volunteer program [J].
Ahmed, SM ;
Maurana, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 90 (03) :439-440
[2]  
Ahmed SM, 2016, PROG COMM HLTH PARTN, V10, P51, DOI 10.1353/cpr.2016.0019
[3]   Towards Building a Bridge between Community Engagement in Research (CEnR) and Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) [J].
Ahmed, Syed M. ;
Nelson, David ;
Kissack, Anne ;
Franco, Zeno ;
Whittle, Jeff ;
Kotchen, Theodore ;
Meurer, John R. ;
Morzinski, Jeffrey ;
Brandenburg, Terry .
CTS-Clinical and Translational Science, 2015, 8 (02) :160-165
[4]   Community Engagement in Research: Frameworks for Education and Peer Review [J].
Ahmed, Syed M. ;
Palermo, Ann-Gel S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 100 (08) :1380-1387
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 99 AG HEALTHC RES QU
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Principles of community engagement
[7]  
Bartunek J.M., 1984, Group organization management, V9, P417, DOI DOI 10.1177/105960118400900307
[8]   Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity [J].
Belone, Lorenda ;
Lucero, Julie E. ;
Duran, Bonnie ;
Tafoya, Greg ;
Baker, Elizabeth A. ;
Chan, Domin ;
Chang, Charlotte ;
Greene-Moton, Ella ;
Kelley, Michele A. ;
Wallerstein, Nina .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2016, 26 (01) :117-135
[9]   A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews [J].
Boeije, H .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2002, 36 (04) :391-409
[10]   Community-engaged scholarship: Is faculty work in communities a true academic enterprise? [J].
Calleson, DC ;
Jordan, C ;
Seifer, SD .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (04) :317-321