Classification of Potential Water Bodies Using Landsat 8 OLI and a Combination of Two Boosted Random Forest Classifiers

被引:114
作者
Ko, Byoung Chul [1 ]
Kim, Hyeong Hun [1 ]
Nam, Jae Yeal [1 ]
机构
[1] Keimyung Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Daegu 704701, South Korea
关键词
Landsat; 8; OLI sensor; water body classification; boosted random forest; INDEX NDWI; SATELLITE;
D O I
10.3390/s150613763
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study proposes a new water body classification method using top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance and water indices (WIs) of the Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) sensor and its corresponding random forest classifiers. In this study, multispectral images from the OLI sensor are represented as TOA reflectance and WI values because a classification result using two measures is better than raw spectral images. Two types of boosted random forest (BRF) classifiers are learned using TOA reflectance and WI values, respectively, instead of the heuristic threshold or unsupervised methods. The final probability is summed linearly using the probabilities of two different BRFs to classify image pixels to water class. This study first demonstrates that the Landsat 8 OLI sensor has higher classification rate because it provides improved signal-to-ratio radiometric by using 12-bit quantization of the data instead of 8-bit as available from other sensors. In addition, we prove that the performance of the proposed combination of two BRF classifiers shows robust water body classification results, regardless of topology, river properties, and background environment.
引用
收藏
页码:13763 / 13777
页数:15
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[2]   Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors [J].
Chander, Gyanesh ;
Markham, Brian L. ;
Helder, Dennis L. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 113 (05) :893-903
[3]   Automated Water Extraction Index: A new technique for surface water mapping using Landsat imagery [J].
Feyisa, Gudina L. ;
Meilby, Henrik ;
Fensholt, Rasmus ;
Proud, Simon R. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 140 :23-35
[4]   Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment [J].
Foody, GM .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 80 (01) :185-201
[5]   The next Landsat satellite: The Landsat Data Continuity Mission [J].
Irons, James R. ;
Dwyer, John L. ;
Barsi, Julia A. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 122 :11-21
[6]   An Automated Method for Extracting Rivers and Lakes from Landsat Imagery [J].
Jiang, Hao ;
Feng, Min ;
Zhu, Yunqiang ;
Lu, Ning ;
Huang, Jianxi ;
Xiao, Tong .
REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 6 (06) :5067-5089
[7]  
Kalkana K., 2013, P REM SENS SPAT INF, P125
[8]   X-ray Image Classification Using Random Forests with Local Wavelet-Based CS-Local Binary Patterns [J].
Ko, Byoung Chul ;
Kim, Seong Hoon ;
Nam, Jae-Yeal .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2011, 24 (06) :1141-1151
[9]   Survey of computer vision-based natural disaster warning systems [J].
Ko, ByoungChul ;
Kwak, Sooyeong .
OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 51 (07)
[10]   A Comparison of Land Surface Water Mapping Using the Normalized Difference Water Index from TM, ETM plus and ALI [J].
Li, Wenbo ;
Du, Zhiqiang ;
Ling, Feng ;
Zhou, Dongbo ;
Wang, Hailei ;
Gui, Yuanmiao ;
Sun, Bingyu ;
Zhang, Xiaoming .
REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 5 (11) :5530-5549