Provincial screening rates for chronic diseases of lifestyle, cancers and HIV in a health-insured population

被引:13
作者
Adonis, L. [1 ]
An, R. [2 ]
Luiz, J. [3 ]
Mehrotra, A. [2 ]
Patel, D. [4 ]
Basu, D. [1 ]
Sturm, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[3] Univ Cape Town, Grad Sch Business, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
[4] Discovery Vital, Sandton, South Africa
来源
SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2013年 / 103卷 / 05期
关键词
PREDICTORS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.7196/SAMJ.6686
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Screening for asymptomatic diseases can reduce the burden of morbidity and mortality in all population groups. There is widespread geographical variation in the quality of care. Few data are available on national screening rates in South Africa and how these vary across the provinces. Objective. To examine screening rates for chronic diseases of lifestyle (CDL), HIV and cancer in a privately insured population for a single insurer across all nine provinces in South Africa, and to determine whether or not there are any differences between the provinces. Method. Screening rates were calculated as the proportion of eligible members who had received screening tests during 2011 in each province. Mean screening rates were compared between Gauteng and the other eight provinces. Results. Nationwide screening rates were 20.5% for CDL, 8.2% for HIV and 31.9% for cancer. Despite similar insurance coverage, screening rates ranged from 0.3% to 0.95% lower in other provinces compared with Gauteng. Of all the provinces, Gauteng had the highest annual screening rates for CDL, breast cancer, prostate cancer and HIV (p<0.001), while the Western Cape had the highest rate for cervical cancer (p<0.001). Conclusion. There is much variation in preventive care utilisation across the provinces within this health-insured population. Provinces with more abundant healthcare resources have higher screening rates. Further research is required to understand the reasons for the variation, given equal payment access.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 312
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   Update on the health disparities literature [J].
Long, JA ;
Chang, VW ;
Ibrahim, SA ;
Asch, DA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (10) :805-812
[12]  
McIntyre D., 2007, South African Health Review
[13]   Access to mammography screening in a large urban population: a multi-level analysis [J].
Meersman, Stephen C. ;
Breen, Nancy ;
Pickle, Linda W. ;
Meissner, Helen I. ;
Simon, Paul .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2009, 20 (08) :1469-1482
[14]   Mammography facilities are accessible, so why is utilization so low? [J].
Mobley, Lee R. ;
Kuo, Tzy-Mey ;
Clayton, Laurel J. ;
Evans, W. Douglas .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2009, 20 (06) :1017-1028
[15]   Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines for US Women Aged 25-64: Data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) [J].
Nelson, Wendy ;
Moser, Richard P. ;
Gaffey, Allison ;
Waldron, William .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2009, 18 (11) :1759-1768
[16]  
Richardson Harriet, 2007, Open Med, V1, pe3
[17]   Prevalence and predictors of cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska native people: the EARTH study [J].
Schumacher, Mary Catherine ;
Slattery, Martha L. ;
Lanier, Anne P. ;
Ma, Khe-Ni ;
Edwards, Sandra ;
Ferucci, Elizabeth D. ;
Tom-Orme, Lillian .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2008, 19 (07) :725-737
[18]   Predictors of PSA Screening Among Men Over 40 Years of Age Who Had Ever Heard about PSA [J].
Seo, Hyung Seok ;
Lee, Nam Kyu ;
Hong, Sung Kyu .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (06) :391-397
[19]   Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations [J].
Zapka, JG ;
Lemon, SC .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (05) :1165-1187
[20]   Health insurance and household income associated with mammography utilization among American women, 2000-2008 [J].
Zhao Da-hai ;
Zhang Zhi-ruo ;
Rao Ke-qin .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (20) :3320-3326