Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique

被引:177
作者
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza [1 ]
Kariminejad, Narges [2 ]
Amiri, Mahdis [2 ]
Edalat, Mohsen [3 ]
Zarafshar, Mehrdad [4 ]
Blaschke, Thomas [5 ]
Cerda, Artemio [6 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ, Coll Agr, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Engn, Shiraz 7144165186, Iran
[2] Gorgan Univ Agr Sci & Nat Resources, Dept Watershed & Arid Zone Management, Gorgan 49189434, Golestan, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ, Sch Agr, Crop Prod & Plant Breeding Dept, Shiraz 7144165186, Iran
[4] AREEO, Nat Resources Dept, Fars Agr & Nat Resources Res & Educ Ctr, Shiraz, Fars, Iran
[5] Univ Salzburg, Dept Geoinformat, Z GIS, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[6] Univ Valencia, Dept Geog, Soil Eros & Degradat Res Grp, Valencia, Spain
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; RANDOM FOREST; FLOOD INUNDATION; MODELS; GIS; ALGORITHM; PREVALENCE; PREDICTION; BIVARIATE; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-60191-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of the current study was to suggest a multi-hazard probability assessment in Fars Province, Shiraz City, and its four strategic watersheds. At first, we construct maps depicting the most effective factors on floods (12 factors), forest fires (10 factors), and landslides (10 factors), and used the Boruta algorithm to prioritize the impact of each respective factor on the occurrence of each hazard. Subsequently, flood, landslides, and forest fire susceptibility maps prepared using a Random Forest (RF) model in the R statistical software. Results indicate that 42.83% of the study area are not susceptible to any hazards, while 2.67% of the area is at risk of all three hazards. The results of the multi-hazard map in Shiraz City indicate that 25% of Shiraz city is very susceptible to flooding, while 16% is very susceptible to landslide occurrences. For four strategic watersheds, it is notable that in the Dorodzan Watershed, landslides and floods are the most important hazards; whereas, flood occurrences cover the largest area of the Maharlou Watershed. In contrast, the Tashk-Bakhtegan Watershed is so sensible to floods and landslides, respectively. Finally, in the Ghareaghaj Watershed, forest fire ranks as the strongest hazard, followed by floods. The validation results indicate an AUC of 0.834, 0.939, and 0.943 for the flood, landslide, and forest fire susceptibility maps, respectively. Also, other accuracy measures including, specificity, sensitivity, TSS, CCI, and Gini coefficient confirmed results of the AUC values. These results allow us to forecast the spatial behavior of such multi-hazard events, and researchers and stakeholders alike can apply them to evaluate hazards under various mitigation scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Modeling forest fire risk in the northeast of Iran using remote sensing and GIS techniques [J].
Adab, Hamed ;
Kanniah, Kasturi Devi ;
Solaimani, Karim .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 65 (03) :1723-1743
[2]   Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) [J].
Allouche, Omri ;
Tsoar, Asaf ;
Kadmon, Ronen .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2006, 43 (06) :1223-1232
[3]   Assessment of the importance of gully erosion effective factors using Boruta algorithm and its spatial modeling and mapping using three machine learning algorithms [J].
Amiri, Mandis ;
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza ;
Ghanbarian, Gholam Abbas ;
Afzali, Sayed Fakhreddin .
GEODERMA, 2019, 340 :55-69
[4]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[5]   A methodological approach for the definition of multi-risk maps at regional level: first application [J].
Carpignano, A. ;
Golia, E. ;
Di Mauro, C. ;
Bouchon, S. ;
Nordvik, J-P. .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2009, 12 (3-4) :513-534
[6]   Evaluation of Random Forest and Adaboost tree-based ensemble classification and spectral band selection for ecotope mapping using airborne hyperspectral imagery [J].
Chan, Jonathan Cheung-Wai ;
Paelinckx, Desire .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 112 (06) :2999-3011
[7]   A GIS-based comparative study of Dempster-Shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza ;
Zhao, Zhou .
GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 32 (04) :367-385
[8]  
Countryman C. M., 1972, 7 PSW USDA FOR SERV, V7, P12
[9]  
Crozier TM, 2009, DENDRITIC SPINES: BIOCHEMISTRY, MODELING AND PROPERTIES, P1
[10]   Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview [J].
Dai, FC ;
Lee, CF ;
Ngai, YY .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2002, 64 (01) :65-87