Gaze-Based Prediction of Students' Understanding of Physics Line-Graphs: An Eye-Tracking-Data Based Machine-Learning Approach

被引:3
作者
Kuechemann, Stefan [1 ]
Becker, Sebastian [1 ]
Klein, Pascal [2 ]
Kuhn, Jochen [1 ]
机构
[1] TU Kaiserslautern, Dept Phys, Phys Educ Res Grp, Kaiserslautern, Germany
[2] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Dept Phys, Phys Educ Res Grp, Gottingen, Germany
来源
COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION (CSEDU 2020) | 2021年 / 1473卷
关键词
Eye tracking; Machine learning; Total visit duration; AOI transitions; Problem solving; Graphs; Physics;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-86439-2_23
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Graphs are important formats to measure conceptual knowledge in physics - especially in kinematics. Although there is a broad line of research studying the quality of such tests regarding validity and reliability, little is known about learners' cognitive processes during solving problems with line graphs. In this work, we used a large gaze-data set of 115 high-school students who solved the widely studied Test of Understanding Graphs in Kinematics (TUG-K). We used a supervised machine-learning approach to classify the students' performance using different eye-tracking metrics, specifically the total visit duration and the transitions between areas of interest for one selected item of the TUG-K. Using only five features, the results show that both metrics provide a comparable predictability of students' performance, which is significantly better than a combination of both measures. Surprisingly, only with large data sets, the combination of both metrics achieves the highest predictability. In this sense, the results provide a guide for the selection and combination of features in adaptive learning environments.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 467
页数:18
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations [J].
Ainsworth, Shaaron .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2006, 16 (03) :183-198
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Use of representations in reasoning and problem solving: Analysis and improvement
[3]   TESTING STUDENT INTERPRETATION OF KINEMATICS GRAPHS [J].
BEICHNER, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1994, 62 (08) :750-762
[4]   Visual Comparison of Eye Movement Patterns [J].
Blascheck, Tanja ;
Schweizer, Markus ;
Beck, Fabian ;
Ertl, Thomas .
COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM, 2017, 36 (03) :87-97
[5]   Changes in Students' Understanding of and Visual Attention on Digitally Represented Graphs Across Two Domains in Higher Education: A Postreplication Study [J].
Brueckner, Sebastian ;
Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga ;
Kuechemann, Stefan ;
Klein, Pascal ;
Kuhn, Jochen .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
[6]   The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic and molecular representations [J].
Cook, Michelle ;
Wiebe, Eric N. ;
Carter, Glenda .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2008, 92 (05) :848-867
[7]   Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction [J].
diSessa, AA .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2004, 22 (03) :293-331
[8]   Expertise Differences in the Comprehension of Visualizations: a Meta-Analysis of Eye-Tracking Research in Professional Domains [J].
Gegenfurtner, Andreas ;
Lehtinen, Erno ;
Saljo, Roger .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2011, 23 (04) :523-552
[9]  
Geron A., 2019, Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems
[10]  
Gurel DK, 2015, EURASIA J MATH SCI T, V11, P989